Calnan D P, Fagbemi A, Berlanga-Acosta J, Marchbank T, Sizer T, Lakhoo K, Edwards A D, Playford R J
University Division of Gastroenterology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Gut. 2000 Nov;47(5):622-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.5.622.
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is normally present as EGF(1-53). A variety of C terminal truncated forms have been used in preliminary trials for treating gastrointestinal injury but their relative potency and stability when used in a clinical setting are unclear. Therefore, we compared the biological activity of recombinant EGF(1-53), EGF(1-52), EGF(1-51), and the C terminal peptides EGF(44-53) and EGF(49-53).
Purity of forms was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Bioactivity of the different EGF forms was determined using [methyl-(3)H] thymidine incorporation into primary rat hepatocytes and their ability to reduce indomethacin (20 mg/kg subcutaneously)/restraint induced gastric injury in rats. Stability of EGF peptides was determined by serial sampling from a syringe driver system containing EGF/4% albumin in saline.
Biological activity assays of EGF(1-53), EGF(1-52), and EGF(1-51) gave almost identical thymidine uptake dose-response curves (maximal responses increasing baseline uptake from 4400 (600) cpm (mean (SEM)) to about 22 000 (2000) cpm when EGF was added at 1. 6 nM). EGF(44-53) and EGF(49-53) did not stimulate (3)H thymidine uptake. Control rats had 47 (4) mm(2) damage/stomach, EGF(1-51), EGF(1-52), and EGF(1-53) at 0.16 and 0.80 nmol/kg/h each reduced gastric injury by about 50% and 80%, respectively (both doses p<0.01 compared with control but no significant difference between the different forms). EGF was stable at room temperature for seven days but biological activity decreased by 35% and 40% at two and three weeks, respectively (both p<0.01). Exposure to light did not affect bioactivity.
EGF(1-51) and EGF(1-52) are as biologically active as full length EGF(1-53) but the C terminal penta- and decapeptides are ineffective. Clinical trials of EGF can probably use infusion systems for at least 48 hours at room temperature and with exposure to light, without reducing biological efficacy.
表皮生长因子(EGF)通常以EGF(1 - 53)的形式存在。多种C末端截短形式已在治疗胃肠道损伤的初步试验中使用,但它们在临床环境中使用时的相对效力和稳定性尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了重组EGF(1 - 53)、EGF(1 - 52)、EGF(1 - 51)以及C末端肽EGF(44 - 53)和EGF(49 - 53)的生物活性。
通过质谱法确认各形式的纯度。使用[甲基 - (3)H]胸苷掺入原代大鼠肝细胞以及它们减轻吲哚美辛(20 mg/kg皮下注射)/束缚诱导的大鼠胃损伤的能力来测定不同EGF形式的生物活性。通过从含有EGF/4%白蛋白的生理盐水的注射器驱动系统中连续取样来测定EGF肽的稳定性。
EGF(1 - 53)、EGF(1 - 52)和EGF(1 - 51)的生物活性测定给出了几乎相同的胸苷摄取剂量 - 反应曲线(当以1.6 nM添加EGF时,最大反应使基线摄取从4400(600)cpm(平均值(标准误))增加到约22000(2000)cpm)。EGF(44 - 53)和EGF(49 - 53)未刺激(3)H胸苷摄取。对照大鼠每只胃有47(4)mm²损伤,EGF(1 - 51)、EGF(1 - 52)和EGF(1 - 53)分别以0.16和0.80 nmol/kg/h的剂量使胃损伤减少约50%和80%(两个剂量与对照相比p<0.01,但不同形式之间无显著差异)。EGF在室温下7天稳定,但在2周和3周时生物活性分别下降35%和40%(两者p<0.01)。光照不影响生物活性。
EGF(1 - 51)和EGF(1 - 52)与全长EGF(1 - 53)具有相同的生物活性,但C末端五肽和十肽无效。EGF的临床试验可能可以在室温下且暴露于光照的情况下使用输注系统至少48小时,而不会降低生物疗效。