Campbell F, Jones K
Royal College of Nursing, Radcliffe Royal Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford, UK, OX2 6HE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(4):CD002154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002154.
Two recent epidemiological studies have reported that children using non-feather pillows suffered from more frequent episodes of wheeze than those using feather pillows
To evaluate the efficacy of using feather bedding in the control of asthma symptoms.
The Cochrane Airways Group asthma clinical trials register, derived from MEDLINE, EMBASE and hand searching of major journals, was searched using the terms: feather OR bed* OR linen* OR pillow
Only randomised or controlled clinical trials were to be included.
No trials met the inclusion criteria for the review.
126 abstracts were identified. Ten of these were identified as possibly meeting the entry criteria, but on review of the full paper not were suitable. The reasons for exclusion were: not a randomised trial (n=6); allocation of bedding type combined with another intervention (n=4).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Whilst recent epidemiological studies suggest that feather bedding is associated with less frequent wheeze than man-made fibre fillings, the evidence currently available is insufficient to assess the clinical benefits of feather bedding in the management of asthma.
两项近期的流行病学研究报告称，使用非羽毛枕头的儿童喘息发作频率高于使用羽毛枕头的儿童。
评估使用羽毛床上用品控制哮喘症状的疗效。
使用检索词“羽毛或床或亚麻布或枕头”检索了考科蓝气道组哮喘临床试验注册库，该注册库源自MEDLINE、EMBASE以及对主要期刊的手工检索。
仅纳入随机或对照临床试验。
无试验符合该综述的纳入标准。
共识别出126篇摘要。其中10篇被确定可能符合纳入标准，但在审阅全文后发现并不合适。排除原因如下：非随机试验（n = 6）；床上用品类型分配与另一项干预措施相结合（n = 4）。
尽管近期的流行病学研究表明，与人造纤维填充物相比，羽毛床上用品与喘息发作频率较低有关，但目前可得的证据不足以评估羽毛床上用品在哮喘管理中的临床益处。
