Suppr超能文献

体积描记法、单次呼吸氧气测试和肺活量测定法在人群研究中的可靠性。

Reliability of plethysmography, the single breath oxygen test, and spirometry in population studies.

作者信息

Detels R, Coulson A, Tashkin D, Rokaw S

出版信息

Bull Physiopathol Respir (Nancy). 1975 Jan-Feb;11(1):9-30.

PMID:1104017
Abstract

Three thousand five hundred and twenty-eight residents of a census tract in Los Angeles, California underwent pulmonary function testing in a mobile laboratory (the Breathmobile). Tests included respiratory questionnaire, electronic spirometry, the single breath O2 test and body plethysmography. The reliability and sensitivity of the tests performed in the Breathmobile was measured by repeating the same tests and others on a 3% probability sample at the University of California at Los Angeles Pulmonary Function Laboratory. The reliability of the FVC and FEV1 was excellent; of the FEF 25-75% and the FEF 50-75% -- good; and of the VTG, RA and delta N2 -- reasonably good. As yet the reliability of the closing volume fraction is inadequate in our study. Grouping by individual reported symptom complexes identified different groups of people. The questionnaire and the forced expiratory flow rates identified the most people as having decreased respiratory function. Selection of the best breath or average of the two best breaths affected results of spirometry very little.

摘要

加利福尼亚州洛杉矶一个普查区的3528名居民在一个移动实验室(呼吸移动车)中接受了肺功能测试。测试包括呼吸问卷、电子肺量计、单次呼吸氧气测试和体容积描记法。通过在加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校肺功能实验室对3%概率样本重复相同测试及其他测试,来测量呼吸移动车中所进行测试的可靠性和敏感性。用力肺活量(FVC)和第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的可靠性极佳;25%-75%用力呼气流量(FEF 25-75%)和50%-75%用力呼气流量(FEF 50-75%)的可靠性良好;而肺活量(VTG)、残气量(RA)和氮增量(delta N2)的可靠性还算不错。在我们的研究中,闭合容积分数的可靠性目前仍不足。按个体报告的症状复合体进行分组可识别出不同人群。问卷和用力呼气流速识别出的呼吸功能下降者最多。选择最佳呼吸或两次最佳呼吸的平均值对肺量计结果影响很小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验