• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管支架存在时的磁共振成像:对不同支架方向、序列类型和场强下伪影的系统评估。

MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.

作者信息

Klemm T, Duda S, Machann J, Seekamp-Rahn K, Schnieder L, Claussen C D, Schick F

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;12(4):606-15. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200010)12:4<606::aid-jmri14>3.0.co;2-j.

DOI:10.1002/1522-2586(200010)12:4<606::aid-jmri14>3.0.co;2-j
PMID:11042644
Abstract

A systematic evaluation of the potential quality of magnetic resonance images recorded in the presence of metallic stents was performed on a low-field open imager operating at 0.2 T and on a high-field closed unit operating at 1.0 T. Eight different stent types were examined by two-dimensional gradient-echo sequences with echo times of 4 and 10 msec and by a fast spin-echo technique. In addition, a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence was applied with an echo time of 2.4 msec. A set of sequence and slice parameters was used on both scanners. Thus, artifacts due to susceptibility effects depending on the magnetic field strength could be distinguished from radiofrequency shielding effects in the lumen of the stents (independent of the field strength). Nine different orthogonal orientations of the stent axis and the image (in terms of slice, read, and phase-encoding direction) were tested, and the artifacts (extension of signal void and visibility of the lumen) were compared. The optimal strategy for visualization of vascular and perivascular regions outside the stents was fast spin-echo imaging with the stent axis and read direction parallel to the static field. Susceptibility-induced signal void in gradient-echo images was minimal using the three-dimensional approach. Increased transmitter amplitudes above usual values provided clearly improved insight in the lumen using gradient-echo sequences.

摘要

在一台0.2T的低场开放式成像仪和一台1.0T的高场封闭式成像仪上,对在金属支架存在的情况下记录的磁共振图像的潜在质量进行了系统评估。通过回波时间为4毫秒和10毫秒的二维梯度回波序列以及快速自旋回波技术,对8种不同类型的支架进行了检查。此外,还应用了回波时间为2.4毫秒的三维梯度回波序列。两台扫描仪都使用了一组序列和切片参数。因此,可以将取决于磁场强度的磁化率效应引起的伪影与支架腔内的射频屏蔽效应(与场强无关)区分开来。测试了支架轴与图像的9种不同正交方向(在切片、读出和相位编码方向方面),并比较了伪影(信号缺失的扩展和管腔的可见性)。支架外血管和血管周围区域可视化的最佳策略是使用支架轴与读出方向平行于静磁场的快速自旋回波成像。使用三维方法时,梯度回波图像中由磁化率引起的信号缺失最小。使用梯度回波序列时,高于通常值的发射机幅度可明显改善对管腔的观察。

相似文献

1
MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.血管支架存在时的磁共振成像:对不同支架方向、序列类型和场强下伪影的系统评估。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Oct;12(4):606-15. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200010)12:4<606::aid-jmri14>3.0.co;2-j.
2
[Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].[金属血管植入物(支架)导致的磁共振成像伪影的系统研究]
Rofo. 2003 Dec;175(12):1711-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45329.
3
MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.血管支架的磁共振成像:磁化率、血流及射频涡流的影响
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Mar;12(3):365-71. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61918-6.
4
In vitro stent assessment by MRI: visibility of lumen and artifacts for 27 modern stents.通过磁共振成像进行体外支架评估:27种现代支架的管腔可视性及伪影
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2017 Nov 27;62(6):565-573. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2016-0008.
5
In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.三维磁共振血管造影中血管内支架伪影的体外评估
Invest Radiol. 2001 Apr;36(4):218-24. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200104000-00004.
6
Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents.316L不锈钢合金与镍钛合金支架的MRI兼容性比较
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2002;4(4):423-30. doi: 10.1081/jcmr-120016381.
7
Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.对比增强磁共振血管造影术下支架的表现:14个支架的体外检查
Radiology. 2000 Oct;217(1):173-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00se28173.
8
[In vitro examination of the visibility of 11 stent catheters with real-time MR imaging].[11种支架导管在实时磁共振成像下可视性的体外检查]
Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1311-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813402.
9
[Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].[支架的磁共振成像:3特斯拉下的体外定量检查]
Z Med Phys. 2009;19(4):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
10
Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation.磁共振引导下活检与抽吸中的针定位:场强、序列设计和磁场方向的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jun;166(6):1337-45. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633445.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Three-Dimensional T1-weighted MR Imaging Visualize the Vascular Lumen after Carotid Artery Stenting?三维T1加权磁共振成像能否显示颈动脉支架置入术后的血管腔?
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2025 Jul 31;24(4). doi: 10.2463/mrms.tn.2023-0129. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Heating of Large Endovascular Stents and Stent Grafts in Magnetic Particle Imaging-Influence of Measurement Parameters and Isocenter Distance.大血管内支架和支架移植物在磁粒子成像中的加热-测量参数和等中心距离的影响。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Mar;46(3):392-399. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03324-7. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Can magnetic resonance imaging after cranioplasty using titanium mesh detect brain tumors?
钛网颅骨修补术后磁共振成像能检测出脑肿瘤吗?
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Mar;46(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s13246-022-01200-9. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
4
Fluoroscopy, CT, and MR imaging characteristics of a novel primarily bioresorbable flow-diverting stent for aneurysms.新型主要可生物吸收的血流导向支架治疗动脉瘤的透视、CT 和 MR 成像特征。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Dec;28(6):660-667. doi: 10.1177/15910199211060979. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters.不同类型颅内血流导向装置引起的磁共振血管成像伪影的影响。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Jun 7;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00753-0.
6
Magnetic Particle Imaging: In vitro Signal Analysis and Lumen Quantification of 21 Endovascular Stents.磁粒子成像:21 个血管内支架的体外信号分析和管腔定量
Int J Nanomedicine. 2021 Jan 11;16:213-221. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S284694. eCollection 2021.
7
performance of echoPIV for assessment of laminar flow profiles in a carotid artery stent.用于评估颈动脉支架中层流剖面的回声粒子图像测速技术的性能
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jan;8(1):017001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.1.017001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
Investigating Signal Loss due to a Carotid Artery Stent in 3D-TOF-MRA.探讨 3D-TOF-MRA 中颈动脉支架导致的信号丢失。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021 Sep 1;20(3):303-311. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0083. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Three-dimensional Gradient-echo is Effective in Suppressing Radiofrequency Shielding by a Titanium Mesh.三维梯度回波有效抑制钛网的射频屏蔽。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2021 Jun 1;20(2):182-189. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0180. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography: current frontiers and future horizons.非对比冠状动脉磁共振血管成像:当前的前沿和未来的前景。
MAGMA. 2020 Oct;33(5):591-612. doi: 10.1007/s10334-020-00834-8. Epub 2020 Apr 2.