Lovie-Kitchin J E, Bowers A R, Woods R L
Centre for Eye Research, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 Sep;20(5):360-70.
Previous studies have shown that reading rate for very large print (6 degrees, 1.86 logMAR character size) is a strong predictor of oral reading rate with low vision devices (LVDs). We investigated whether this would apply using large print sizes more readily available in clinical situations (e.g. 2 degrees, 1.4 logMAR), for subjects with macular degeneration. We assessed rauding rates--reading for understanding. A combination of near word visual acuity and large print reading rate (without LVDs) provided the best prediction of oral rauding rates (with LVDs). However, near word visual acuity alone was almost as good. Similarly, silent rauding rate was predicted best by near word visual acuity alone. We give near visual acuity limits as a clinical guide to expected oral and silent reading performance with LVDs for patients with macular degeneration.
先前的研究表明,超大字号(6度,1.86对数最小分辨角字符大小)的阅读速度是低视力患者使用低视力设备(LVD)进行口头阅读速度的有力预测指标。我们调查了对于黄斑变性患者,在临床情况下更容易获得的较大字号(例如2度,1.4对数最小分辨角)是否也适用。我们评估了理解性阅读速度。近距单词视力和大字阅读速度(不使用LVD)的组合能最好地预测使用LVD时的口头理解性阅读速度。然而,仅近距单词视力的预测效果几乎一样好。同样,仅近距单词视力能最好地预测默读理解速度。我们给出近视力限制,作为黄斑变性患者使用LVD时预期口头和默读表现的临床指南。