Suppr超能文献

戒烟方面的社会经济差异:社会参与的作用。

Socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation: the role of social participation.

作者信息

Lindström M, Hanson B S, Ostergren P O, Berglund G

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2000 Sep;28(3):200-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether psychosocial resources explain socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation and its maintenance.

METHODS

A subpopulation of 11,837 individuals from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study interviewed in 1992-94, age range 45-64 years, was investigated in this cross-sectional study. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess relative risks of having stopped smoking, adjusting for age, country of origin, previous/current diseases, and marital status.

RESULTS

An odds ratio of 1.9 (1.4-2.5; 95% CI) for men and 2.0 (1.4-2.7; 95% CI) for women of having stopped smoking was found for higher non-manual employees when compared with unskilled manual workers. A decrease in these odds ratios was found when social participation was introduced into the model. The other three social network and social support variables were non-significant.

CONCLUSION

High social participation is a predictor of maintenance of smoking cessation. It seems possible to interpret parts of the socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation and its maintenance as a consequence of differing social network resources and social capital between socioeconomic groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查社会心理资源是否能解释戒烟及其维持方面的社会经济差异。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,对1992年至1994年间接受访谈的来自马尔默饮食与癌症研究的11837名个体(年龄范围45至64岁)的一个亚群体进行了调查。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估戒烟的相对风险,并对年龄、原籍国、既往/当前疾病和婚姻状况进行了调整。

结果

与非技术体力劳动者相比,较高的非体力劳动者戒烟的优势比男性为1.9(1.4 - 2.5;95%置信区间),女性为2.0(1.4 - 2.7;95%置信区间)。当将社会参与纳入模型时,这些优势比有所下降。其他三个社会网络和社会支持变量不显著。

结论

高社会参与度是戒烟维持的一个预测因素。似乎可以将戒烟及其维持方面的部分社会经济差异解释为社会经济群体之间社会网络资源和社会资本不同的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验