Zhou Shuo, Li Yaqiang, Levinson Arnold H
Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Aurora, CO, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jul 1;15:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100856. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Smoking prevalence is well known to vary socioeconomically but has been less studied in relation to political participation. Growing evidence suggests that health disparities and political nonparticipation are intertwined, but the underlying mechanism is unclear.
We investigated the relationship between smoking and voter registration, testing various forms of trust as possible mediators, in U.S. national survey data collected around the 2012 presidential election.
A random half ( = 9757) of adults who completed The Attitudes and Behaviors Survey on Health (TABS) in 2012 (response rate was 58.4% for landline and 24.3% for cell phone) also answered a section on voter registration, voting behavior, and trust in people and selected institutions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between smoking and registering to vote and potential mediation by trust in people and various institutions, adjusted for covariates known to be associated with both. Analyses used design-based methods with weights to account for sampling probabilities, nonresponse, and calibration to the U.S. adult population in 2012.
Compared with nonsmokers, daily smokers had significantly lower adjusted odds of being registered to vote (aOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.52) and higher adjusted odds of having low trust in people (aOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.29-4.83). Low trust in people predicted lower odds of registering to vote (aOR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.84) and partially mediated the smoking-registration relationship.
Lower electoral participation among daily smokers is partly attributable to lower trust in people, a factor that could also affect willingness to use cessation support resources such as quitlines. Low trust and low political participation among daily smokers may have important political and public health consequences.
众所周知,吸烟率在社会经济层面存在差异,但与政治参与的相关性研究较少。越来越多的证据表明,健康差距与政治不参与相互交织,但其潜在机制尚不清楚。
我们在美国2012年总统大选前后收集的全国调查数据中,研究吸烟与选民登记之间的关系,并测试各种形式的信任作为可能的中介因素。
2012年完成健康态度与行为调查(TABS)的成年人中,随机抽取一半(n = 9757)(固定电话的回复率为58.4%,手机的回复率为24.3%),他们还回答了关于选民登记、投票行为以及对人和选定机构的信任的部分内容。多变量逻辑回归用于检验吸烟与登记投票之间的关联,以及对人和各种机构的信任作为潜在中介因素的作用,并对已知与两者都相关的协变量进行了调整。分析采用基于设计的方法,并使用权重来考虑抽样概率、无应答情况以及与2012年美国成年人口的校准。
与不吸烟者相比,每日吸烟者登记投票的调整后几率显著更低(调整后比值比:0.33,95%置信区间:0.21 - 0.52),对人缺乏信任的调整后几率更高(调整后比值比:2.50,95%置信区间:1.29 - 4.83)。对人缺乏信任预示着登记投票的几率更低(调整后比值比:0.55,95%置信区间:0.36至0.84),并部分中介了吸烟与登记之间的关系。
每日吸烟者较低的选举参与度部分归因于对人缺乏信任,这一因素也可能影响使用戒烟热线等戒烟支持资源的意愿。每日吸烟者的低信任度和低政治参与度可能会产生重要的政治和公共卫生后果。