• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健医生对基因检测障碍的看法及其参与研究的意愿。

Primary care physicians' perceptions of barriers to genetic testing and their willingness to participate in research.

作者信息

Mountcastle-Shah E, Holtzman N A

机构信息

Genetics and Public Policy Studies, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2004, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Genet. 2000 Oct 23;94(5):409-16. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001023)94:5<409::aid-ajmg13>3.0.co;2-u.

DOI:10.1002/1096-8628(20001023)94:5<409::aid-ajmg13>3.0.co;2-u
PMID:11050628
Abstract

Our objective was to explore the barriers and motivations to: 1) appropriate diffusion of genetic services into primary care practice; and 2) primary care physicians' (PCPs) willingness to participate in clinical studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of emerging genetic technologies. A random sample (n = 994) of PCPs was invited to be interviewed. Of the 80 who agreed, 60 were interviewed, 52 by telephone. A semi-structured guide was used. A questionnaire mailed to 752 of the PCPs was used to elicit information from physicians who did not want to be interviewed. Among interviewees, uncertainty as to the clinical utility and clinical validity of predictive genetic testing were the leading barriers to incorporation of this technology into practice, being mentioned by 60 and 43% of subjects, respectively. Of the 100 (13. 3%) physicians returning the questionnaire who declined to be interviewed, 30% said they would be willing to participate in research on the safety and effectiveness of predictive genetic tests. Of those who were interviewed, 92% were willing to participate in such research. Most physicians do not see genetics as important in their practice today; many anticipate greater importance in the future. The proportion of physicians interested in participating in research to assess the safety and effectiveness of genetic tests is sufficient to make large scale, collaborative, practice-based evaluation feasible. Additionally, participation in research may serve as an effective medium for physician education in genetics.

摘要

我们的目标是探究以下两方面的障碍与动机

1)将基因服务合理推广至初级保健实践中;2)初级保健医生(PCP)参与临床研究以评估新兴基因技术的安全性和有效性的意愿。我们邀请了一个PCP随机样本(n = 994)参与访谈。在同意参与的80人中,有60人接受了访谈,其中52人通过电话访谈。采用了半结构化指南。向752名PCP邮寄了问卷,以从不想接受访谈的医生那里获取信息。在受访者中,对预测性基因检测的临床实用性和临床有效性的不确定性是将该技术纳入实践的主要障碍,分别有60%和43%的受访者提到了这一点。在返回问卷且拒绝接受访谈的100名(13.3%)医生中,30%表示他们愿意参与预测性基因检测安全性和有效性的研究。在接受访谈的人中,92%愿意参与此类研究。如今,大多数医生认为遗传学在他们的实践中并不重要;许多人预计未来其重要性会增加。有兴趣参与评估基因检测安全性和有效性研究的医生比例足以使大规模、协作性的基于实践的评估成为可能。此外,参与研究可能是对医生进行遗传学教育的有效途径。

相似文献

1
Primary care physicians' perceptions of barriers to genetic testing and their willingness to participate in research.初级保健医生对基因检测障碍的看法及其参与研究的意愿。
Am J Med Genet. 2000 Oct 23;94(5):409-16. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001023)94:5<409::aid-ajmg13>3.0.co;2-u.
2
Genetics and Genomics in Clinical Practice: The Views of Wisconsin Physicians.临床实践中的遗传学与基因组学:威斯康星州医生的观点
WMJ. 2017 Jun;116(2):69-74.
3
Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.门诊医疗中无针对性的健康信息技术实施有利于基于纸质的变通方法,并限制了健康数据交换。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Nov;84(11):920-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing.测量医生对模糊性的容忍度及其与他们报告的基因检测实践的关系。
Med Care. 1993 Nov;31(11):989-1001. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00002.
5
Canadian Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes Toward Understanding Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Screening.加拿大初级保健医生对理解糖尿病筛查临床实践指南的态度。
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Dec;40(6):580-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
Physicians' Awareness and Utilization of Genetic Services in Texas.德克萨斯州医生对基因服务的认知与利用情况
J Genet Couns. 2018 Aug;27(4):968-977. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0199-z. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
7
US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国医生对癌症易感性基因检测的态度。
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Jul 1;120A(1):63-71. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10192.
8
Health-care professionals' perceived trust in and willingness to recommend functional foods: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对功能性食品的感知信任度及推荐意愿:一项定性研究
Appetite. 2007 Mar;48(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
9
Recommend, but also Discuss: Different Patterns of Physician-Perceived Barriers to Discussing HPV Vaccination and Their Association with Vaccine Administration in 11-12 Year-Old Girls.建议,但也要讨论:医生在讨论人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种时所感知到的不同障碍模式及其与11至12岁女孩疫苗接种的关联。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Dec;20(12):2539-2547. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2079-9.
10
Primary care provider perceptions and experiences of implementing hepatitis C virus birth cohort testing: a qualitative formative evaluation.初级医疗服务提供者对实施丙型肝炎病毒出生队列检测的看法和经验:一项定性的形成性评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4043-z.

引用本文的文献

1
How practice setting affects family physicians' views on genetic screening: a qualitative study.实践环境如何影响家庭医生对基因筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 1;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01492-y.
2
Views on Precision Medicine among Health Professionals in Korea: A Mixed Methods Study.韩国卫生专业人员对精准医学的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Feb;61(2):192-197. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.2.192.
3
Physicians' attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing before and after pharmacogenetic education.药物遗传学教育前后医生对药物遗传学检测的态度。
Per Med. 2016 Mar;13(2):119-127. doi: 10.2217/pme.15.57. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
4
Clinical pharmacogenomics: patient perspectives of pharmacogenomic testing and the incidence of actionable test results in a chronic disease cohort.临床药物基因组学:慢性病队列中患者对药物基因组检测的看法及可采取行动的检测结果发生率
Per Med. 2017 Sep;14(5):383-388. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017-0022. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Preconception care: promoting reproductive planning.孕前保健:促进生育计划
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 26;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S2.
6
Gatekeepers or intermediaries? The role of clinicians in commercial genomic testing.把关者还是中间人?临床医生在商业基因检测中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108484. eCollection 2014.
7
A call for policy action in sub-Saharan Africa to rethink diagnostics for pregnancy affected by sickle cell disease: differential views of medical doctors, parents and adult patients predict value conflicts in Cameroon.呼吁撒哈拉以南非洲采取政策行动,重新思考镰状细胞病影响的妊娠诊断:喀麦隆医生、父母和成年患者的不同观点预示着价值冲突
OMICS. 2014 Jul;18(7):472-80. doi: 10.1089/omi.2013.0167. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.初级保健在扩大新生儿筛查中的作用:足跟采血试验后。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Aug;59(8):861-8.
9
Examining the impact of genetic testing for type 2 diabetes on health behaviors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.探讨 2 型糖尿病基因检测对健康行为的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-121.
10
Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.初级保健医生对直接面向消费者的基因检测的教育需求。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):469-78. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9471-9. Epub 2011 Dec 30.