Velásquez M, Arcos-Burgos M, Toro M E, Castaño A, Madrigal L, Moreno S, Jaramillo N, Lopera F
Grupo Biogénesis, Programa de Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Neurol. 2000;31(6):501-6.
Prevalence of late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) both familial and sporadic is increasing with the raising proportion of third-age population. There are evidences either supporting or rejecting the existence of differences in the behavior of neuropsychological variables between familial and sporadic cases of LOAD.
To identify neuropsychological variables discriminating between familial and sporadic cases of LOAD, in order to detect clinical manifestations that may provide information on the pathological process of the neurodegenerative process.
Using sequential sampling, we selected individuals affected by LOAD according to the criteria of the DSM-IV and NINCS-ADRDA. The following neuropsychological protocol was used: CERAD, Wisconsin, Phonological Fluency, Rey's Figure, Raven, A Cancellation Test, WAIS (Arithmetic); also used were: Global Deterioration Scale, Functional Assessment Staging of Reisberg (FAST), Barthel and Yesavage. Parametrical and non-parametrical univariate, factorial (principal components) and discriminant analyses were performed. In total, 52 patients were analyzed (average age: 74.8 years; mean age at onset of the disease: 69 years; time of disease's evolution: 5.7 years; average of educational level: 6.4 years).
No significant statistical differences were found in clinical or neuropsychological variables between familial and sporadic cases of LOAD. Additionally, neither variables nor models were detected discriminating significantly between them.
Familial and sporadic cases of LOAD present the same clinical and neuropsychological phenotype which makes very probable that sporadic cases are low penetrance familial ones.
随着老年人口比例的上升,家族性和散发性晚发性阿尔茨海默病(LOAD)的患病率正在增加。有证据支持或反对LOAD家族性和散发性病例在神经心理学变量行为上存在差异。
识别区分LOAD家族性和散发性病例的神经心理学变量,以便检测可能提供有关神经退行性病变病理过程信息的临床表现。
采用序贯抽样,根据DSM-IV和NINCS-ADRDA标准选择受LOAD影响的个体。使用了以下神经心理学测试方案:CERAD、威斯康星卡片分类测验、语音流畅性测验、雷氏图形测验、瑞文推理测验、取消测验、韦氏成人智力量表(算术部分);还使用了:总体衰退量表、雷斯伯格功能评定分期(FAST)、巴氏指数和耶萨维奇焦虑量表。进行了参数和非参数单变量、因子分析(主成分分析)和判别分析。总共分析了52例患者(平均年龄:74.8岁;疾病发病平均年龄:69岁;疾病进展时间:5.7年;平均教育水平:6.4年)。
LOAD家族性和散发性病例在临床或神经心理学变量上未发现显著统计学差异。此外,未检测到在它们之间有显著区分的变量或模型。
LOAD家族性和散发性病例表现出相同的临床和神经心理学表型,这使得散发性病例很可能是低外显率的家族性病例。