Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, Duffort J F, Eller P, Justumus P, Marin P, Oscaby F, Simonet T, Benqué E, Brunel G
Recherche et Etude en Parodontologie, Groupe de Toulouse, France.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):691-700.
The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate cumulative success and survival rates of ITI implants after 7 years. A complete medical report was obtained for all 440 patients enrolled in this investigation, which involved 10 different private practices. The 1,022 consecutively placed implants were distributed between completely edentulous, partially edentulous, and single-tooth replacement cases. During the annual follow-up visit, each implant was examined both clinically and radiographically using predefined success criteria. The cumulative survival and success rates were calculated for all implants. Implant subgroups were defined according to the medical history of the patients or pooled according to various indications, locations, implant designs, or implant lengths. In each subgroup, the related cumulative success rate was statistically compared to the global cumulative success rate. Fifteen implants (1.4%) were regarded as early failures, and at the end of the follow-up, the global failure rate reached 6.6%; 30 implants (3%) were lost to follow-up. At 5 years, the cumulative survival rate was 95.4%; this declined to 92.2% at 7 years. The weakest success rates were observed for implants placed in older patients, periodontally treated patients, and completely edentulous arches. Conversely, cumulative success rates that were significantly above average were observed for patients between 40 and 60 years old without pathology, implants placed after bone regeneration, solid-screw implants, implants placed in edentulous spaces, and implants placed as single-tooth replacements. This investigation has demonstrated that in these 10 private practice settings, the success rate for ITI implants remained high for up to 5 years and declined slightly between 5 and 7 years. It should be noted that in later year intervals, a relatively small number of implants remained for the analysis of cumulative success rates.
这项多中心研究的目的是评估7年后ITI种植体的累积成功率和存留率。我们获取了参与本次调查的所有440例患者的完整医疗报告,该调查涉及10家不同的私人诊所。连续植入的1022枚种植体分布于全口无牙、部分无牙和单颗牙缺失的病例中。在每年的随访中,根据预先定义的成功标准对每枚种植体进行临床和影像学检查。计算所有种植体的累积存留率和成功率。种植体亚组根据患者的病史进行定义,或根据各种适应证、位置、种植体设计或种植体长轴进行汇总。在每个亚组中,将相关的累积成功率与总体累积成功率进行统计学比较。15枚种植体(1.4%)被视为早期失败,随访结束时,总体失败率达到6.6%;30枚种植体(3%)失访。5年时,累积存留率为95.4%;7年时降至92.2%。在老年患者、接受过牙周治疗的患者和全口无牙牙弓中植入的种植体成功率最低。相反,在40至60岁无病变的患者、骨再生后植入的种植体、实心螺钉种植体、植入无牙间隙的种植体以及单颗牙缺失植入的种植体中,观察到累积成功率显著高于平均水平。这项调查表明,在这10家私人诊所中,ITI种植体的成功率在长达5年的时间内保持较高水平,在5至7年之间略有下降。需要注意的是,在后续年份中,用于累积成功率分析的种植体数量相对较少。