de Araújo Nobre Miguel, Antunes Carolina, Lopes Armando, Ferro Ana, Nunes Mariana, Gouveia Miguel, Azevedo Coutinho Francisco, Salvado Francisco
Research, Development and Education Department, Malo Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Level 11, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.
Clínica Universitária de Estomatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 8;13(6):1549. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061549.
: Short implants have been used in the restoration of edentulous jaws in the past several years. However, some studies have suggested that short implants are less successful than standard implants. The aim of this study is to investigate the outcome of short implants placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible following one-stage or immediate-function protocols with a follow-up of 7 years (clinically) and 5 years (radiographically). : This study included 127 patients rehabilitated with 217 implants measuring 7 mm and supporting 157 fixed prostheses in the posterior segments of both jaws. Final abutments were delivered at the surgery stage and were loaded after 4 months in 116 patients (199 implants). The primary outcome measure was implant survival measured through life tables. Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss and the incidence of biological and mechanical complications at the patient level and implant level (evaluated through descriptive statistics). : Twenty-four patients (18.9%) with 45 implants (20.7%) were lost to the follow-up. In total, 32 implants failed (14.8%) in 22 patients (17.3%), resulting in a cumulative survival rate at 7 years of 81.2% for 7 mm implants in the rehabilitation of the posterior regions of the maxilla and mandible. The average (standard deviation) marginal bone loss was 1.47 mm (0.99 mm) at 5 years. The incidence rate of biological complications was 12.6% and 10.6% at the patient and implant levels, respectively. The incidence rate of mechanical complications was 21.3% for patients and 16.1% for implants. A higher failure rate was registered in smokers and in implant arrangements with a sequence of three fixtures in proximity. : Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the placement of 7 mm long implants for the partial implant-supported rehabilitation of atrophic posterior jaws is possible in the long term, judging by the survival rate and stable average marginal bone loss. Nevertheless, strict case selection should be performed, especially in smokers and with implant arrangements that provide a minimum of one unit in inter-implant distance.
在过去几年中,短种植体已被用于无牙颌的修复。然而,一些研究表明,短种植体的成功率低于标准种植体。本研究的目的是调查在上颌或下颌后部采用一期或即刻功能修复方案植入短种植体并随访7年(临床)和5年(影像学)后的效果。
本研究纳入了127例患者,他们在上下颌后部植入了217枚7毫米的种植体,支持157个固定修复体。最终基台在手术阶段安装,并在4个月后对116例患者(199枚种植体)进行加载。主要观察指标是通过生命表测量种植体存活率。次要观察指标是边缘骨吸收以及患者和种植体水平上生物学和机械并发症的发生率(通过描述性统计进行评估)。
24例患者(18.9%)的45枚种植体(20.7%)失访。总共22例患者(17.3%)的32枚种植体失败(14.8%),导致在上颌和下颌后部修复中,7毫米种植体7年的累积存活率为81.2%。5年时平均(标准差)边缘骨吸收为1.47毫米(0.99毫米)。患者和种植体水平上生物学并发症的发生率分别为12.6%和10.6%。患者和种植体的机械并发症发生率分别为21.3%和16.1%。吸烟者以及种植体排列为三个种植体相邻的情况下失败率更高。
在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,从存活率和稳定的平均边缘骨吸收情况判断,长期来看,7毫米长的种植体用于萎缩性后牙区部分种植支持修复是可行的。然而,应进行严格的病例选择,尤其是对于吸烟者以及种植体间距至少为一个单位的种植体排列情况。