• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知负荷与平等启发式:小群体中资源过度消耗的两阶段模型

Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups.

作者信息

Roch SG, Lane JA, Samuelson CD, Allison ST, Dent JL

机构信息

Illinois Institute of Technology

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Nov;83(2):185-212. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2915.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.2000.2915
PMID:11056068
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to test a two-stage model of the psychological mechanisms underlying the overconsumption of scarce resources in small groups. The model proposes that members of groups sharing resources first anchor their consumption choices on an "equal-division" heuristic and then, given sufficient cognitive capacity, adjust their choices in a self-serving direction. The results from both studies support the model. The first study found that when faced with a common resource pool almost all group members expressed thoughts regarding equality; however, individuals with sufficient cognitive capacity requested more from the pool and expressed more task-relevant thoughts than individuals lacking the necessary cognitive resources. The second study provided additional support for the two-stage model by demonstrating that group members' cognitions occur in the order predicted by the model and by demonstrating that an individual difference, social value orientation, affects thought processes only when individuals are not experiencing high cognitive loads. Implications are discussed. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

摘要

进行了两项研究,以测试小群体中稀缺资源过度消费背后心理机制的两阶段模型。该模型提出,共享资源的群体成员首先将其消费选择锚定在“平均分配”启发式上,然后,在有足够认知能力的情况下,朝着利己的方向调整他们的选择。两项研究的结果都支持该模型。第一项研究发现,当面对一个公共资源库时,几乎所有群体成员都表达了关于平等的想法;然而,与缺乏必要认知资源的个体相比,有足够认知能力的个体从资源库中索取更多,并表达了更多与任务相关的想法。第二项研究通过证明群体成员的认知按照模型预测的顺序发生,并通过证明个体差异(社会价值取向)仅在个体没有经历高认知负荷时才会影响思维过程,为两阶段模型提供了额外支持。文中讨论了相关影响。版权所有2000年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups.认知负荷与平等启发式:小群体中资源过度消耗的两阶段模型
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Nov;83(2):185-212. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2915.
2
[Validation of a scale for responsibility (Salkovskis Responsibility Scale)].[责任量表(索尔科夫斯基责任量表)的验证]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):229-37.
3
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
4
[Validation of the Short Cognitive Battery (B2C). Value in screening for Alzheimer's disease and depressive disorders in psychiatric practice].[简短认知功能测试组合(B2C)的验证。在精神科实践中筛查阿尔茨海默病和抑郁症的价值]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):266-72.
5
A Social Categorization Explanation for Framing Effects in Nested Social Dilemmas.
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Aug;79(2):154-178. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2842.
6
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
7
The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework.海豚的社会结构与策略:基于生态框架的预测
Adv Mar Biol. 2007;53:195-294. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53003-8.
8
Transforming Individuals into Groups: Some Hallmarks of the SDS Approach to Small Group Research.将个体转变为群体:SDS 小组研究方法的一些特点。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Oct;80(1):21-27. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2852.
9
Self-help groups as mutual support: what do carers value?作为互助形式的自助团体:照顾者看重什么?
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Jan;15(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00660.x.
10
Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes.群体决策中的认知多样性与共识:输入、过程和结果的作用
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):310-335. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2943.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of inequality on social value orientation: an eye-tracking study.不平等对社会价值取向的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 28;16:1521101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521101. eCollection 2025.
2
Another in need enhances prosociality and modulates frontal theta oscillations in young adults.他人的需求增强了年轻人的亲社会行为并调节额叶θ振荡。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 13;14:1160209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160209. eCollection 2023.
3
Evidence of a Bidirectional Association Between Daily Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction That Is Moderated by Daily Stress.
每日性满足和关系满意度之间存在双向关联的证据,这种关联受到每日压力的调节。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):3791-3806. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02399-0. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Impact of nonclinical factors on intensive care unit admission decisions: a vignette-based randomized trial (V-TRIAGE).非临床因素对重症监护病房收治决策的影响:一项基于病例 vignette 的随机试验(V-TRIAGE)
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021 Apr-Jun;33(2):219-230. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210029.
5
Reflectivity relates differently to pro sociality in naïve and strategic subjects.在天真和策略主体中,反射率与亲社会行为的关系不同。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 17;11(1):12745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91960-3.
6
Looking at Spillovers in the Mirror: Making a Case for "Behavioral Spillunders".审视镜像中的溢出效应:为“行为性负溢出效应”正名
Front Psychol. 2019 May 16;10:1142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01142. eCollection 2019.
7
Beliefs about others' intentions determine whether cooperation is the faster choice.对他人意图的信念决定了合作是否是更快的选择。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 14;8(1):7509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25926-3.
8
Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.经济博弈中的反应时间反映了亲社会个体和自利个体在不同类型决策冲突中的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):6394-6399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608877114. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Deliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: evidence from USA and India.深思熟虑通过让人们忽略他们的相对份额来促进社会效率:来自美国和印度的证据。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Feb 15;4(2):160605. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160605. eCollection 2017 Feb.
10
Gender-Specific Effects of Cognitive Load on Social Discounting.认知负荷对社会折扣的性别特异性影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 27;11(10):e0165289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165289. eCollection 2016.