Cook D, Ricard J D, Reeve B, Randall J, Wigg M, Brochard L, Dreyfuss D
Department of Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;28(10):3547-54. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200010000-00034.
To determine the use of ventilator circuit and secretion management strategies in France and Canada.
Binational cross-sectional survey.
Intensive care unit (ICU) directors in French and Canadian university hospitals.
We compared responses between countries regarding the use of seven circuit and secretion strategies, the rationales against their use, decisional responsibility for these strategies, whether ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) practice was audited, and whether VAP prevention guidelines addressing these strategies were used.
The response rate was 72/84 (85.7%) for French and 31/32 (96.9%) for Canadian ICUs. Endotracheal intubation was predominantly oral in both countries. Changing the ventilator circuits only for every new patient was more frequent in France than in Canada (p < .0001). Heated humidifiers were used more in Canada than France (p = .0003). Closed endotracheal suctioning was used more frequently in Canada (p < .0001). In both countries, subglottic secretion drainage and kinetic beds were rarely used. Semirecumbent positioning was reported more often by French than Canadian ICUs (p = .003). Reasons for nonuse of these strategies included adverse effects (heat and moisture exchangers), cost (kinetic beds), lack of convincing benefit (subglottic secretion drainage), and nurse inconvenience (semirecumbency). Decisional responsibility for each strategy differed among institutions. VAP prevention practice was periodically reviewed in 53% of French and 68% of Canadian ICUs (p = .20). VAP prevention guidelines were used in 64% and 30% of these ICUs, respectively (p = .002).
Our study does not support the notion that published recommendations substantially impact reported use of several ventilator circuit and secretion management strategies. Based on the use of more frequent ventilator circuit changes, closed suctioning systems, heated humidifiers, and respiratory therapists, ventilator circuit and secretion management practice appears more costly in Canada than in France.
确定法国和加拿大呼吸机回路及分泌物管理策略的使用情况。
双边横断面调查。
法国和加拿大大学医院的重症监护病房(ICU)主任。
我们比较了两国在七种回路及分泌物策略的使用、不使用这些策略的理由、这些策略的决策责任、是否对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的实践进行审核以及是否使用了针对这些策略的VAP预防指南等方面的回答。
法国ICU的回复率为72/84(85.7%),加拿大ICU的回复率为31/32(96.9%)。两国气管插管均以经口为主。仅为每位新患者更换呼吸机回路在法国比在加拿大更频繁(p <.0001)。加拿大比法国更多地使用加热湿化器(p =.0003)。加拿大更频繁地使用密闭式气管内吸痰(p <.0001)。在两国,声门下分泌物引流和动力床很少使用。法国ICU比加拿大ICU更常报告采用半卧位(p =.003)。不使用这些策略的原因包括不良反应(热湿交换器)、成本(动力床)、缺乏令人信服的益处(声门下分泌物引流)以及护士不便(半卧位)。各机构对每种策略的决策责任不同。53%的法国ICU和68%的加拿大ICU定期审查VAP预防实践(p =.20)。这些ICU中分别有64%和30%使用了VAP预防指南(p =.002)。
我们的研究不支持已发表的建议对所报告的几种呼吸机回路及分泌物管理策略的使用有重大影响这一观点。基于更频繁更换呼吸机回路、密闭吸痰系统、加热湿化器以及呼吸治疗师的使用情况,加拿大的呼吸机回路及分泌物管理实践似乎比法国成本更高。