Suppr超能文献

外部合作与绩效:北卡罗来纳州地方公共卫生部门,1996年

External collaboration and performance: North Carolina local public health departments, 1996.

作者信息

Lovelace K

机构信息

Department of Public Health Education, School of Health and Human Performance, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 27412-6169, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;115(4):350-7. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.4.350.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the extent to which local public health departments in North Carolina collaborated with other groups and organizations, the health problems on which they worked together, and the effect of external collaboration on health departments' performance on core public health functions.

METHODS

The author mailed a questionnaire asking about interactions with city and county government agencies, boards of health, schools, nonprofits, physicians/private clinics, community health centers/migrant clinics, community members, citizens' groups, state and federal agencies, and universities to all of the directors of local public health departments in North Carolina. Sixty-four directors returned the questionnaire, for a response rate of 74.4%.

RESULTS

Local public health departments most frequently interacted with boards of health, state agencies, community members, schools, city and county government agencies, and nonprofit agencies. Large majorities reported productive relationships with boards of health, state agencies, city and county government agencies, schools, nonprofit agencies, and hospitals. Greater frequency of interaction with several types of partners was associated with better performance.

CONCLUSIONS

While questions exist about whether performance on core functions improves the community's health status, the results suggest that it is important for local public health departments to continue to build relationships with other organizations in the community.

摘要

目标

本研究调查了北卡罗来纳州的地方公共卫生部门与其他团体和组织的合作程度、他们共同处理的健康问题,以及外部合作对卫生部门在核心公共卫生职能方面表现的影响。

方法

作者向北卡罗来纳州所有地方公共卫生部门的主管邮寄了一份问卷,询问他们与市、县政府机构、卫生委员会、学校、非营利组织、医生/私人诊所、社区卫生中心/流动诊所、社区成员、公民团体、州和联邦机构以及大学的互动情况。64位主管回复了问卷,回复率为74.4%。

结果

地方公共卫生部门最常与卫生委员会、州机构、社区成员、学校、市和县政府机构以及非营利机构互动。绝大多数人报告称与卫生委员会、州机构、市和县政府机构、学校、非营利机构以及医院建立了富有成效的关系。与多种类型合作伙伴互动的频率越高,表现越好。

结论

虽然关于核心职能的表现是否能改善社区健康状况存在疑问,但结果表明,地方公共卫生部门继续与社区中的其他组织建立关系非常重要。

相似文献

3
Local public health system partnerships.地方公共卫生系统伙伴关系。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Jan-Feb;120(1):76-83. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000113.

引用本文的文献

1
The Structure of Policy Networks for Injury and Violence Prevention in 15 US Cities.美国15个城市预防伤害和暴力的政策网络结构
Public Health Rep. 2017 May/Jun;132(3):381-388. doi: 10.1177/0033354917705367. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
2
Multisector Health Policy Networks in 15 Large US Cities.美国15个大城市的多部门卫生政策网络
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22(6):520-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000401.
8
Public health systems research: setting a national agenda.公共卫生系统研究:制定国家议程。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):410-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046037. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
9
Structure and functions of state public health agencies.州公共卫生机构的结构与职能。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jan;96(1):167-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.053439. Epub 2005 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to academic and practice linkages.学术与实践联系的障碍。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Nov;5(6):99-101. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199911000-00014.
5
Implications of the results of community intervention trials.社区干预试验结果的意义
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:379-416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.379.
9
An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.关于健康促进项目的生态学视角。
Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500401.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验