Suppr超能文献

新生儿听力障碍的识别:总结与建议。

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: summary and recommendations.

作者信息

Norton S J, Gorga M P, Widen J E, Folsom R C, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr B R, Fletcher K A

机构信息

Multi-Center Consortium on Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):529-35. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article summarizes the results of a multi-center study, "Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment," sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance characteristics of three measures of peripheral auditory system status, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brain stem responses (ABR), applied in the neonatal period in predicting hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age.

DESIGN

The design and implementation of this study are described in the first two articles in this series. Seven institutions participated in this study; 7179 infants were evaluated. Graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit and well babies with one or more risk factors for hearing loss were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Neonatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the "gold standard."

RESULTS

The major results of the study are described in the nine articles preceding this summary article. TEOAEs in response to an 80 dB pSPL click, DPOAEs in response to L1 = 65 and L2 = 50 dB SPL and ABR in response to a 30 dB nHL click performed well as predictors of permanent hearing loss of 30 dB or greater at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. All measures were robust with respect to infant state, test environment and infant medical status. No test performed perfectly.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data from this study, the 1993 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference-recommended protocol-an OAE test followed by an ABR test for those infants failing the OAE test-would result in low referral rate (96 to 98%). TEOAEs for 80 dB pSPL, ABR for 30 dB nHL and DPOAEs for L1 = 65 dB SPL and L2 = 50 dB SPL perform well in predicting hearing status based on the area under the relative operating characteristic curve. Accuracy for the OAE measurements are best when the speech awareness threshold or the pure-tone average for 2.0 kHz and 4 kHz are used as the gold standard. ABR accuracy varies little as a function of the frequencies included in the gold standard. In addition, 96% of those infants returning for VRA at 8 to 12 mo corrected age were able to provide reliable ear-specific behavioral thresholds using insert earphones and a rigorous psychophysical VRA protocol.

摘要

目的

本文总结了一项由美国国立卫生研究院资助的多中心研究“新生儿听力障碍的识别”的结果。本研究的目的是确定三种评估外周听觉系统状态的方法的性能特征,即瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAEs)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAEs)和听性脑干反应(ABR),这些方法应用于新生儿期,以预测矫正年龄8至12个月时的听力状况。

设计

本研究的设计和实施在本系列的前两篇文章中已有描述。七家机构参与了本研究;对7179名婴儿进行了评估。将新生儿重症监护病房的毕业生以及有一个或多个听力损失风险因素的健康婴儿作为随访测试的对象,在矫正年龄8至12个月时使用视觉强化测听法(VRA)进行测试。以VRA数据作为“金标准”来评估新生儿测试的性能。

结果

本研究的主要结果在本总结文章之前的九篇文章中已有描述。对80 dB pSPL短声的TEOAEs、对L1 = 65 dB SPL和L2 = 50 dB SPL的DPOAEs以及对30 dB nHL短声的ABR,作为矫正年龄8至12个月时30 dB或更大永久性听力损失的预测指标表现良好。所有测量方法在婴儿状态、测试环境和婴儿健康状况方面都很可靠。没有一种测试是完美的。

结论

根据本研究的数据,1993年美国国立卫生研究院共识会议推荐的方案——先进行耳声发射测试,对耳声发射测试未通过的婴儿再进行听性脑干反应测试——将导致较低的转诊率(96%至98%)。基于相对操作特征曲线下的面积,对80 dB pSPL的TEOAEs、对30 dB nHL的ABR以及对L1 = 65 dB SPL和L2 = 50 dB SPL的DPOAEs在预测听力状况方面表现良好。当将言语察觉阈值或2.0 kHz和4 kHz的纯音平均值用作金标准时,耳声发射测量的准确性最佳。听性脑干反应的准确性随金标准中包含的频率变化不大。此外,在矫正年龄8至12个月时返回进行VRA测试的婴儿中,96%能够使用插入式耳机和严格的心理物理学VRA方案提供可靠的耳特异性行为阈值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验