加拿大艾伯塔省微生物实验室使用的定量革兰氏染色解读标准。
Quantitative gram stain interpretation criteria used by microbiology laboratories in Alberta, Canada.
作者信息
Church D, Melnyk E, Unger B
机构信息
Laboratory Proficiency-Testing Program, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta.
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4266-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.11.4266-4268.2000.
Abstract
Microbiology laboratories in Alberta, Canada, were surveyed to determine the quantitative interpretive criteria used to routinely read and report Gram stains. There was a wide variability in the quantitative reporting criteria cited for both cells and bacteria, with only 11 of 32 (34.4%) laboratories surveyed using the criteria recommended by the external proficiency-testing program. Lack of standardized criteria not only poses a problem in the grading of proficiency testing results but may also impact the quality of patient care.
摘要
对加拿大艾伯塔省的微生物实验室进行了调查，以确定用于常规读取和报告革兰氏染色的定量解释标准。在细胞和细菌的定量报告标准方面存在很大差异，在接受调查的32家实验室中，只有11家（34.4%）使用了外部能力验证计划推荐的标准。缺乏标准化标准不仅在能力验证结果的评分方面存在问题，还可能影响患者护理质量。
相似文献
1
Quantitative gram stain interpretation criteria used by microbiology laboratories in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省微生物实验室使用的定量革兰氏染色解读标准。
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4266-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.11.4266-4268.2000.
2
Mechanisms to assess Gram stain interpretation proficiency of technologists at satellite laboratories.评估卫星实验室技术人员革兰氏染色判读能力的机制。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov;45(11):3754-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01632-07. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
3
Improving Gram stain proficiency in hospital and satellite laboratories that do not have microbiology.提高不具备微生物学条件的医院和卫星实验室的革兰氏染色水平。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):458-461. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0556.
4
Positive blood cultures: can we always trust the Gram stain?血培养阳性：我们总能相信革兰氏染色结果吗？
Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Nov;126(5):671-2. doi: 10.1309/A3A7-34C9-1JHP-HWB6.
5
Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.阳性血培养革兰氏染色结果判读错误。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Nov;126(5):686-90. doi: 10.1309/V4KE2FPM5T8V4552.
6
Multicenter Assessment of Gram Stain Error Rates.革兰氏染色错误率的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jun;54(6):1442-1447. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03066-15. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
[Reviews for Gram stain].[革兰氏染色的综述]
Rinsho Byori. 2002 May;50(5):449-54.
8
Re-evaluation of rejection criteria for endotracheal tube (ETT) specimens from adult patients.成人患者经气管内导管（ETT）标本排斥标准的再评估。
J Med Microbiol. 2012 Sep;61(Pt 9):1306-1310. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.042333-0. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
9
The Gram stain.革兰氏染色法。
MLO Med Lab Obs. 2011 Mar;43(3):38.
10
Gram stains and smartphones.革兰氏染色与智能手机。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 15;52(2):278-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq131.
引用本文的文献
1
Identification of causative agents of infective endocarditis by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of resected valves.通过对切除瓣膜进行宏基因组下一代测序鉴定感染性心内膜炎的病原体
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Mar 13;15:1532257. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1532257. eCollection 2025.
2
Wound swab quality grading is dependent on Gram smear screening approach.伤口拭子质量分级取决于革兰氏染色筛查方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 23;13(1):3160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29832-1.
3
Gram Staining: a Comparison of Two Automated Systems and Manual Staining.革兰氏染色：两种自动化系统与手工染色的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Nov 18;58(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01914-20.
4
Risk Model of Bacterial Coinfection in Children with Severe Viral Bronchiolitis.重症病毒性细支气管炎患儿细菌合并感染的风险模型
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Jun;6(2):103-108. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584810. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Biochemical but not compositional recovery of skin mucosal microbiome communities after disruption.皮肤黏膜微生物群落破坏后生化层面而非组成层面的恢复
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Feb 13;12:399-416. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S185992. eCollection 2019.
6
Mechanisms to assess Gram stain interpretation proficiency of technologists at satellite laboratories.评估卫星实验室技术人员革兰氏染色判读能力的机制。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov;45(11):3754-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01632-07. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
本文引用的文献
1
Centralization of a regional clinical microbiology service: The Calgary experience.区域临床微生物学服务的集中化：卡尔加里的经验。
Can J Infect Dis. 1999 Nov;10(6):393-402. doi: 10.1155/1999/372382.
2
Is the stat Gram stain helpful during percutaneous image-guided fluid drainage?在经皮影像引导下的液体引流过程中，静态革兰氏染色有帮助吗？
Acad Radiol. 2000 Apr;7(4):228-31. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80471-7.
3
Effects of restructuring on the performance of microbiology laboratories in Alberta.重组对艾伯塔省微生物实验室绩效的影响。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000 Mar;124(3):357-61. doi: 10.5858/2000-124-0357-EOROTP.
4
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women.低风险孕妇细菌性阴道病的患病率及临床与革兰氏染色诊断标准的相关性
Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;15(10):913-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1007673531595.
5
Clinical utility of cardiac valve Gram stain and culture in patients undergoing native valve replacement.心脏瓣膜革兰氏染色和培养在接受自体瓣膜置换术患者中的临床应用
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 May;122(5):412-5.
6
The impact of blood culture reporting and clinical liaison on the empiric treatment of bacteraemia.血培养报告及临床联络对菌血症经验性治疗的影响。
J Clin Pathol. 1997 Dec;50(12):1010-2. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.12.1010.
7
Randomized trial interpreting sputum quality in a clinical laboratory.在临床实验室中解读痰液质量的随机试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2327-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2327-2329.1987.
8
Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.通过标准化的革兰氏染色解读方法，可提高细菌性阴道病诊断的可靠性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297-301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991.
9
Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.咳出痰液的显微镜及细菌学分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339-44.
10
Assessment of expectorated sputum for bacteriological analysis based on polymorphs and squamous epithelial cells: six-month study.基于多形核细胞和鳞状上皮细胞对咳出痰液进行细菌学分析的评估：为期六个月的研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):635-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.635-637.1978.
Zotero 插件