• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 2. Laboratory testing of the efficacy under conditions simulating those of real-life.

作者信息

Werner H P

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):568-78.

PMID:1106069
Abstract

Using a standardised method (impression method by means of 'Rodac' plates and glass as well as ceramic surfaces as germ carriers) we tested for the efficacy of 3 surface disinfectants (aldehydes, aldehydes + detergent substances, phenol derivatives) and 3 disinfectant cleaning agents (aldehydes + detergent substances + wax) and 2 per cent soft soap solution on Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Sarcina lutea. The method enabled us to calculate the actual germ count reduction and also took account of the natural dying-rate of the test organisms. Their resistance to the different types of active substances varied greatly. Thus the 3 disinfectants had a better effect on Klebsiellae and Staphylococci than on Sarcinae. 2 of the 3 disinfectant cleaning agents, on the other hand, turned out to be less suitable for the elimination of Klebsiellae. It thus follows that Sarcina cannot be used as test organism for in-use tests (see Communication 1) unless the resistance of Staphylococci and Klebsiellae to the test preparation has first been established in laboratory experiments. The general question, namely whether in-use tests provide meaningful and accurate results remain to be elucidated. On the basis of our test results, the exclusive use of soap for cleaning floors, as a substitute of disinfection, should definitely be ruled out. Although soap reduces Gram-positive cocci well in actual practice, it is almost ineffective against problem germs such as Klebsiellae. What should be stipulated is the use of broad-spectrum disinfectants, i.e. they should, if possible, act equally well against different types of germs. From the commercially-available preparations that were tested, a phenol-base product gave the best results. On the basis of these results we venture to doubt that the use of aldehyde preparations which is customary at the moment, is the right approach to fight hospital infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 2. Laboratory testing of the efficacy under conditions simulating those of real-life.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):568-78.
2
Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 1. Tests under real-life conditions.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):551-67.
3
Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 3. Evaluation of the results of in-use and laboratory tests.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):579-89.
4
[Methods for testing surface disinfection procedures under current conventional conditions].[当前常规条件下表面消毒程序的测试方法]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1984 Aug;179(4):340-64.
5
Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies.家庭清洁与表面消毒:新见解与策略
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.037.
6
[A comparison of the results of 4 national methods for the evaluation of disinfectants in 2 laboratories (author's transl)].两个实验室中四种国家消毒剂评价方法的结果比较(作者译)
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Jul;160(4-5):368-91.
7
[Test for the efficacy of disinfectants at surfaces in test models. I. (communication:) Dependence of experimental results on the method of demonstration of surviving germs (swab and rinsing) (author's transl)].[测试模型中消毒剂在表面的功效。I.(通讯):实验结果对存活细菌检测方法(拭子法和冲洗法)的依赖性(作者译)]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1976 Mar;161(5-6):462-73.
8
Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.刚性鼻内镜在体外污染金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和流感嗜血杆菌后的消毒。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jun;139(6):574-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3016.
9
[Development of a new testmethod for surface disinfection procedures. VI. The influence of testmethods on the effect of disinfectants (author's transl)].[表面消毒程序新测试方法的研制。VI. 测试方法对消毒剂效果的影响(作者译)]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Sep;165(1):78-96.
10
[Development of a new testmethod for surface disinfection procedures. V. The reduction of germs by disinfection (author's transl)].
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Sep;165(1):60-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of disinfectants in the domestic environment under 'in use' conditions.在“实际使用”条件下对家用消毒剂的评估。
J Hyg (Lond). 1984 Apr;92(2):193-203. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400064214.