• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 1. Tests under real-life conditions.

作者信息

Dupré M

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):551-67.

PMID:1199525
Abstract

The suitability of disinfection preparations is assessed on the basis of laboratory tests, different methods being used in the various countries. Since such model tests are rather inadequate when it comes to judging surface disinfectants, additional in-use tests are desirable. They might, in any case, serve as a reference system for judging the evaluation criteria which still differ widely at the moment. The experiments described in this study were chiefly designed to establish the effect of cleaning and disinfection measures on bacteria normally present on surfaces and on the artificial contamination of surfaces with Sarcinae as model germs. The tests were carried out in the halls on 5 floors of a medical (lift landings). "Rodac" plates were used to identify the germs. 3 disinfectants (aldehydes, phenol derivative), 3 disinfectant cleaning agents and soft soap were used. The preparations reduced the normal germ count by approx. 80 per cent. The reduction was mainly due to the cleaning effect (soft soap was as effective as the preparations with disinfectant properties). The effect on the "normal germ count" cannot, therefore, be used as sole criterion of disinfectant action. When the various preparations were applied in twice the concentration recommended for Staphylococcus hospitalism, the Sarcina count was reduced by 99 to 99.9 per cent within 2 hours. The efficacy of disinfectants and disinfectant cleaning agents was practically the same. Additional laboratory tests are necessary before the effect of soft soap can be finally assessed. In actual practice the unit count of pathogenic germs- such as Staphylococci and Klebsiellae- is too low to enable an objective assessment of a disinfectant to be made. On the other hand, artificial contamination with such pathogens is not possible because of the risk involved. The use of Sarcina lutea as test germ is therefore subjects to certain limitations. One of the prerequisites for using it is, for example, prior reduction of the normal germ count to values of less than 500/100 cm2. The second communication will report on investigations into the chemoresistance of Sarcina and how this compares with that of Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella. The need for such studies arose from our present investigation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 1. Tests under real-life conditions.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):551-67.
2
Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 2. Laboratory testing of the efficacy under conditions simulating those of real-life.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):568-78.
3
Investigations on the efficacy of surface disinfection and surface cleaning procedures. 3. Evaluation of the results of in-use and laboratory tests.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):579-89.
4
[Methods for testing surface disinfection procedures under current conventional conditions].[当前常规条件下表面消毒程序的测试方法]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1984 Aug;179(4):340-64.
5
[Test for the efficacy of disinfectants at surfaces in test models. I. (communication:) Dependence of experimental results on the method of demonstration of surviving germs (swab and rinsing) (author's transl)].[测试模型中消毒剂在表面的功效。I.(通讯):实验结果对存活细菌检测方法(拭子法和冲洗法)的依赖性(作者译)]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1976 Mar;161(5-6):462-73.
6
[A comparison of the results of 4 national methods for the evaluation of disinfectants in 2 laboratories (author's transl)].两个实验室中四种国家消毒剂评价方法的结果比较(作者译)
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Jul;160(4-5):368-91.
7
[Critical assessment of methods for testing chemical disinfectants and disinfection procedures (author's transl)].化学消毒剂及消毒程序检测方法的批判性评估(作者译)
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1975 Aug;160(6):590-600.
8
Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies.家庭清洁与表面消毒:新见解与策略
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.037.
9
Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.刚性鼻内镜在体外污染金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和流感嗜血杆菌后的消毒。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jun;139(6):574-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3016.
10
[The distribution of microorganisms in household kitchens. I. Problems, experiments, results].[家庭厨房中微生物的分布。I. 问题、实验、结果]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1988 Mar;186(1):1-29.