Mosekilde L, Thomsen J S, Mackey M S, Phipps R J
Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Anatomy, University of Arhus, Arhus, Denmark.
Bone. 2000 Nov;27(5):639-45. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00375-6.
Immobilization leads to rapid loss of bone mass and mechanical competence, and long-term immobilization or repeated periods of short-term immobilization can have serious skeletal consequences and may lead to increased fracture liability. The aim of the present preclinical study was, therefore, to assess whether two antiresorptive agents, risedronate (Ris) or alendronate (Aln), would be capable of preventing immobilization-induced loss of bone mass and strength in rats. The study was designed as a dose-response study, and the site-specific effects of immobilization and of treatment are described. Four-month-old virgin female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into eight groups with 12 animals in each group: (1) immobilized (Imm) control; (2) normal control; (3) Imm + Ris 0.1 mg/kg body weight/day (b.w./day); (4) Imm + Ris 0.2 mg/kg b.w./day; (5) Imm + Ris 1.0 mg/kg b.w./day; (6) Imm + Aln 0.2 mg/kg b.w./day; (7) Imm + Aln 1.0 mg/kg b.w./day; and (8) Imm + Aln 2.0 mg/kg b.w. /day. In groups 1 and 3-8, the right hind leg was immobilized with an elastic bandage. The study period was 28 days. The effects of unilateral hind-limb immobilization and of treatment were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements on tibiae and by biomechanical testing of femora at three different sites: diaphysis; femoral neck; and distal metaphysis. Bilateral measurements were performed (on the immobilized and nonimmobilized legs). Immobilization induced a significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD) at the proximal tibial metaphysis, but no change at the mid-diaphysis. Furthermore, immobilization induced a loss of bone strength at the two femoral metaphyses, but no change was seen in three-point bending of the diaphysis. Both risedronate and alendronate treatment showed a dose-dependent protection against the immobilization-induced loss of bone density and strength at the metaphyses. We conclude that, in rats, short-term hind-limb immobilization affects only the metaphyses and that no changes are seen in the diaphysis. Both risedronate and alendronate can prevent immobilization-induced bone loss at the metaphyses. The present study confirms the importance of examining several skeletal sites when testing the efficacy of therapeutic agents.
制动会导致骨量和力学性能迅速丧失,长期制动或反复短期制动会产生严重的骨骼后果,并可能增加骨折风险。因此,本临床前研究的目的是评估两种抗吸收药物,利塞膦酸盐(Ris)或阿仑膦酸盐(Aln),是否能够预防大鼠制动引起的骨量和强度损失。该研究设计为剂量反应研究,并描述了制动和治疗的部位特异性效应。将4个月大的未孕雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠分为8组,每组12只动物:(1)制动(Imm)对照组;(2)正常对照组;(3)Imm + Ris 0.1 mg/kg体重/天(b.w./天);(4)Imm + Ris 0.2 mg/kg b.w./天;(5)Imm + Ris 1.0 mg/kg b.w./天;(6)Imm + Aln 0.2 mg/kg b.w./天;(7)Imm + Aln 1.0 mg/kg b.w./天;和(8)Imm + Aln 2.0 mg/kg b.w./天。在第1组和第3 - 8组中,用弹性绷带固定右后肢。研究期为28天。通过双能X线吸收法(DEXA)测量胫骨,并在三个不同部位对股骨进行生物力学测试来确定单侧后肢制动和治疗的效果:骨干;股骨颈;和远端干骺端。进行双侧测量(在固定和未固定的腿上)。制动导致近端胫骨干骺端骨密度(BMD)显著降低,但骨干中部无变化。此外,制动导致两个股骨干骺端骨强度降低,但骨干三点弯曲未见变化。利塞膦酸盐和阿仑膦酸盐治疗均显示出对干骺端制动诱导的骨密度和强度损失的剂量依赖性保护作用。我们得出结论,在大鼠中,短期后肢制动仅影响干骺端,骨干未见变化。利塞膦酸盐和阿仑膦酸盐均可预防干骺端制动诱导的骨质流失。本研究证实了在测试治疗药物疗效时检查多个骨骼部位的重要性。