Suppr超能文献

人类基因组中的微卫星变异与重组率

Microsatellite variation and recombination rate in the human genome.

作者信息

Payseur B A, Nachman M W

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.

出版信息

Genetics. 2000 Nov;156(3):1285-98. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.3.1285.

Abstract

Background (purifying) selection on deleterious mutations is expected to remove linked neutral mutations from a population, resulting in a positive correlation between recombination rate and levels of neutral genetic variation, even for markers with high mutation rates. We tested this prediction of the background selection model by comparing recombination rate and levels of microsatellite polymorphism in humans. Published data for 28 unrelated Europeans were used to estimate microsatellite polymorphism (number of alleles, heterozygosity, and variance in allele size) for loci throughout the genome. Recombination rates were estimated from comparisons of genetic and physical maps. First, we analyzed 61 loci from chromosome 22, using the complete sequence of this chromosome to provide exact physical locations. These 61 microsatellites showed no correlation between levels of variation and recombination rate. We then used radiation-hybrid and cytogenetic maps to calculate recombination rates throughout the genome. Recombination rates varied by more than one order of magnitude, and most chromosomes showed significant suppression of recombination near the centromere. Genome-wide analyses provided no evidence for a strong positive correlation between recombination rate and polymorphism, although analyses of loci with at least 20 repeats suggested a weak positive correlation. Comparisons of microsatellites in lowest-recombination and highest-recombination regions also revealed no difference in levels of polymorphism. Together, these results indicate that background selection is not a major determinant of microsatellite variation in humans.

摘要

对有害突变的背景(纯化)选择预计会从种群中去除连锁的中性突变,从而导致重组率与中性遗传变异水平之间呈正相关,即使对于具有高突变率的标记也是如此。我们通过比较人类的重组率和微卫星多态性水平来检验背景选择模型的这一预测。利用28名不相关欧洲人的已发表数据来估计全基因组位点的微卫星多态性(等位基因数量、杂合度和等位基因大小方差)。重组率是通过比较遗传图谱和物理图谱来估计的。首先,我们分析了22号染色体上的61个位点,利用该染色体的完整序列来提供精确的物理位置。这61个微卫星显示变异水平与重组率之间没有相关性。然后我们利用辐射杂种图谱和细胞遗传图谱来计算全基因组的重组率。重组率变化超过一个数量级,大多数染色体在着丝粒附近显示出明显的重组抑制。全基因组分析没有提供重组率与多态性之间存在强正相关的证据,尽管对至少有20个重复的位点的分析表明存在弱正相关。最低重组区域和最高重组区域的微卫星比较也显示多态性水平没有差异。这些结果共同表明,背景选择不是人类微卫星变异的主要决定因素。

相似文献

10
The case for selection at CCR5-Delta32.CCR5-Δ32位点的选择情况。
PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030378. Epub 2005 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Adjusting the focus on human variation.调整对人类变异的关注。
Trends Genet. 2000 Jul;16(7):296-302. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02030-8.
3
The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21.人类21号染色体的DNA序列。
Nature. 2000 May 18;405(6784):311-9. doi: 10.1038/35012518.
4
The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.黑腹果蝇的基因组序列。
Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185-95. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185.
5
The DNA sequence of human chromosome 22.人类22号染色体的DNA序列。
Nature. 1999 Dec 2;402(6761):489-95. doi: 10.1038/990031.
9
A physical map of 30,000 human genes.一张包含3万个人类基因的物理图谱。
Science. 1998 Oct 23;282(5389):744-6. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.744.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验