• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inequalities in access to diabetes care: evidence from a historical cohort study.糖尿病护理可及性的不平等:一项历史性队列研究的证据
Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):85-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.2.85.
2
Care of diabetic patients in hospital clinics and general practice clinics: a study in Dudley.医院诊所和普通诊所中糖尿病患者的护理:达德利的一项研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Feb;43(367):65-9.
3
Do diabetes clinic attendees stay out of hospital? A matched case-control study.糖尿病门诊患者是否能避免住院?一项配对病例对照研究。
Diabet Med. 1999 Aug;16(8):687-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00100.x.
4
Do general practices provide equitable access to physical activity interventions?普通医疗服务机构能否提供公平的体育活动干预措施?
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Oct;58(555):e1-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X342237.
5
What are the social predictors of accident and emergency attendance in disadvantaged neighbourhoods? Results from a cross-sectional household health survey in the north west of England.在贫困社区中,哪些社会因素可以预测意外事故和急诊就诊?来自英格兰西北部一项横断面家庭健康调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 6;9(1):e022820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022820.
6
Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists, and general practitioners.英格兰全科医疗中专科医生外展诊所的评估:患者、专科医生和全科医生的流程及可接受性
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):52-61. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.52.
7
Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes.与糖尿病患者护理过程和结果差异相关的初级保健特征。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 May;51(466):356-60.
8
Paediatric utilisation of a teaching hospital and a community health centre. Predictors of level of care used by children from Khayelitsha, Cape Town.教学医院和社区卫生中心的儿科利用情况。开普敦凯伊利沙儿童使用医疗服务水平的预测因素。
S Afr Med J. 1997 Jan;87(1):31-6.
9
Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者系统性护理提供方面的不平等。
Fam Pract. 2001 Feb;18(1):27-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.1.27.
10
Socioeconomic deprivation and accident and emergency attendances: cross-sectional analysis of general practices in England.社会经济剥夺与急诊就诊情况:对英格兰全科医疗的横断面分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Oct;65(639):e649-54. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686893.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between the Structural Characteristics of General Medical Practices and the Socioeconomic Status of Patients with Diabetes-Related Performance Indicators in Primary Care.基层医疗中一般医疗实践的结构特征与糖尿病相关绩效指标患者社会经济地位之间的关系。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 22;12(7):704. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070704.
2
Inequalities in access to community-based diabetes examination and its impact on healthcare utilization among middle-aged and older adults with diabetes in China.中国中老年糖尿病患者社区糖尿病检查机会的不平等及其对医疗保健利用的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;10:956883. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.956883. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing evidence of inequalities in access to medication for diabetic populations in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.评估低收入和中等收入国家糖尿病患者获得药物治疗方面的不平等证据:一项系统综述
Glob Health Action. 2016 Dec 8;9:32505. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.32505. eCollection 2016.
4
Experiences with Recruitment of Marginalized Groups in a Danish Health Promotion Program: A Document Evaluation Study.丹麦健康促进项目中招募边缘化群体的经验:一项文献评估研究
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158079. eCollection 2016.
5
Sex inequalities in access to care for patients with diabetes in primary care: questionnaire survey.初级保健中糖尿病患者获得护理的性别不平等:问卷调查
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 May;56(526):342-8.
6
Influences on the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between general practices: practice, patient or socioeconomic factors?全科医疗中2型糖尿病患病率差异的影响因素:医疗实践、患者因素还是社会经济因素?
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Jan;53(486):9-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Do diabetes clinic attendees stay out of hospital? A matched case-control study.糖尿病门诊患者是否能避免住院?一项配对病例对照研究。
Diabet Med. 1999 Aug;16(8):687-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00100.x.
2
Variations in use of cardiac services in England: perceptions of general practitioners, general physicians and cardiologists.英格兰心脏服务使用情况的差异:全科医生、普通内科医生和心脏病专家的看法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Jul;3(3):153-8. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300306.
3
Socioeconomic differences in the utilization of health services in a Dutch population: the contribution of health status.荷兰人群健康服务利用中的社会经济差异:健康状况的作用
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)87673-1.
4
Errors in postcode to enumeration district mapping and their effect on small area analyses of health data.邮政编码到枚举区映射中的错误及其对健康数据小区域分析的影响。
J Public Health Med. 1998 Sep;20(3):325-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024776.
5
Shifting of care for diabetes from secondary to primary care, 1990-5: review of general practices.1990 - 1995年糖尿病护理从二级护理向初级护理的转变:全科医疗实践综述
BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1505-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1505.
6
Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality.某卫生当局心脏病学服务使用情况的差异:冠状动脉血运重建率与心绞痛患病率及冠心病死亡率的比较。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 25;314(7076):257-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7076.257.
7
Why don't all general practices offer structured diabetes care? A comparison of practices that do not with those that do.为什么并非所有的全科医疗服务都提供结构化糖尿病护理?对提供和未提供结构化糖尿病护理的医疗服务进行比较。
Public Health. 1996 Nov;110(6):357-60. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80008-4.
8
The relationship between socioeconomic status and diabetes control and complications in the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study.欧洲糖尿病研究组胰岛素依赖型糖尿病并发症研究中社会经济地位与糖尿病控制及并发症之间的关系。
Diabetes Care. 1996 May;19(5):423-30. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.5.423.
9
Socioeconomic status and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者的社会经济地位与心血管疾病危险因素的聚集情况
Diabetes Care. 1996 May;19(5):419-22. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.5.419.
10
Influence of social deprivation on illness in diabetic patients.社会剥夺对糖尿病患者疾病的影响。
BMJ. 1993 Oct 30;307(6912):1115-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6912.1115.

糖尿病护理可及性的不平等:一项历史性队列研究的证据

Inequalities in access to diabetes care: evidence from a historical cohort study.

作者信息

Goyder E C, McNally P G, Botha J L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):85-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.2.85.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.9.2.85
PMID:11067256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743518/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish which factors predict attendance at a hospital diabetes clinic and for diabetes review in general practice.

DESIGN

A historical cohort study of individuals with diabetes identified from general practice records. Information on service contacts and other clinical, social, and demographic variables was collected from general practice records and postal questionnaires.

SETTING

Seven Leicestershire general practices.

SUBJECTS

Individuals registered with study practices who had a diagnosis of diabetes made before 1990.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Attendance at a hospital diabetes clinic or for a documented diabetes review in general practice at least once between 1990 and 1995.

RESULTS

124 (20%) had at least one recorded diabetes review in general practice and 332 (54%) attended a hospital diabetes clinic at least once. The main predictors of attending a hospital clinic were younger age, longer duration of diabetes, and treatment with insulin. Access to a car (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.71), home ownership (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.58) and a non-manual occupation (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.24) were all associated with an increased likelihood of attending, although living in a less deprived area was not. The main predictors of attending for review in general practice were older age, less co-morbidity, and being white. Living in a more deprived area was related to a reduced chance of review in general practice (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.86) while individual socioeconomic indicators were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst an indicator of area deprivation predicts reduced likelihood of review in general practice, individual indicators predict reduced likelihood of attending outpatients. This suggests a need for different approaches to tackling inequalities in access to care in primary and secondary care settings.

摘要

目的

确定哪些因素可预测患者前往医院糖尿病门诊就诊以及在全科医疗中接受糖尿病复查的情况。

设计

一项基于全科医疗记录识别出的糖尿病患者的历史性队列研究。从全科医疗记录和邮政调查问卷中收集有关服务接触以及其他临床、社会和人口统计学变量的信息。

地点

莱斯特郡的七家全科医疗机构。

研究对象

在研究机构注册且于1990年前被诊断为糖尿病的个体。

主要观察指标

1990年至1995年间至少前往医院糖尿病门诊就诊一次或在全科医疗中有记录的糖尿病复查。

结果

124人(20%)在全科医疗中有至少一次记录在案的糖尿病复查,332人(54%)至少前往医院糖尿病门诊就诊一次。前往医院门诊就诊的主要预测因素为年龄较小、糖尿病病程较长以及接受胰岛素治疗。拥有汽车(比值比1.34,95%置信区间1.06至1.71)、自有住房(比值比1.48,95%置信区间1.14至1.58)以及非体力职业(比值比1.56,95%置信区间1.09至2.24)均与就诊可能性增加相关,尽管居住在贫困程度较低地区并非如此。在全科医疗中接受复查的主要预测因素为年龄较大、合并症较少以及为白人。居住在贫困程度较高地区与在全科医疗中接受复查的机会减少相关(比值比0.81,95%置信区间0.76至0.86),而个体社会经济指标则不然。

结论

虽然地区贫困指标预示在全科医疗中接受复查的可能性降低,但个体指标预示门诊就诊可能性降低。这表明在初级和二级医疗环境中解决医疗服务可及性不平等问题需要采用不同方法。