Suppr超能文献

糖尿病护理可及性的不平等:一项历史性队列研究的证据

Inequalities in access to diabetes care: evidence from a historical cohort study.

作者信息

Goyder E C, McNally P G, Botha J L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):85-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.2.85.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish which factors predict attendance at a hospital diabetes clinic and for diabetes review in general practice.

DESIGN

A historical cohort study of individuals with diabetes identified from general practice records. Information on service contacts and other clinical, social, and demographic variables was collected from general practice records and postal questionnaires.

SETTING

Seven Leicestershire general practices.

SUBJECTS

Individuals registered with study practices who had a diagnosis of diabetes made before 1990.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Attendance at a hospital diabetes clinic or for a documented diabetes review in general practice at least once between 1990 and 1995.

RESULTS

124 (20%) had at least one recorded diabetes review in general practice and 332 (54%) attended a hospital diabetes clinic at least once. The main predictors of attending a hospital clinic were younger age, longer duration of diabetes, and treatment with insulin. Access to a car (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.71), home ownership (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.58) and a non-manual occupation (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.24) were all associated with an increased likelihood of attending, although living in a less deprived area was not. The main predictors of attending for review in general practice were older age, less co-morbidity, and being white. Living in a more deprived area was related to a reduced chance of review in general practice (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.86) while individual socioeconomic indicators were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst an indicator of area deprivation predicts reduced likelihood of review in general practice, individual indicators predict reduced likelihood of attending outpatients. This suggests a need for different approaches to tackling inequalities in access to care in primary and secondary care settings.

摘要

目的

确定哪些因素可预测患者前往医院糖尿病门诊就诊以及在全科医疗中接受糖尿病复查的情况。

设计

一项基于全科医疗记录识别出的糖尿病患者的历史性队列研究。从全科医疗记录和邮政调查问卷中收集有关服务接触以及其他临床、社会和人口统计学变量的信息。

地点

莱斯特郡的七家全科医疗机构。

研究对象

在研究机构注册且于1990年前被诊断为糖尿病的个体。

主要观察指标

1990年至1995年间至少前往医院糖尿病门诊就诊一次或在全科医疗中有记录的糖尿病复查。

结果

124人(20%)在全科医疗中有至少一次记录在案的糖尿病复查,332人(54%)至少前往医院糖尿病门诊就诊一次。前往医院门诊就诊的主要预测因素为年龄较小、糖尿病病程较长以及接受胰岛素治疗。拥有汽车(比值比1.34,95%置信区间1.06至1.71)、自有住房(比值比1.48,95%置信区间1.14至1.58)以及非体力职业(比值比1.56,95%置信区间1.09至2.24)均与就诊可能性增加相关,尽管居住在贫困程度较低地区并非如此。在全科医疗中接受复查的主要预测因素为年龄较大、合并症较少以及为白人。居住在贫困程度较高地区与在全科医疗中接受复查的机会减少相关(比值比0.81,95%置信区间0.76至0.86),而个体社会经济指标则不然。

结论

虽然地区贫困指标预示在全科医疗中接受复查的可能性降低,但个体指标预示门诊就诊可能性降低。这表明在初级和二级医疗环境中解决医疗服务可及性不平等问题需要采用不同方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验