Smith M, Wheeldon L
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Cognition. 2001 Feb;78(2):123-64. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00110-4.
Six experiments investigate syntactic priming online via a picture description task in which participants produce target sentences whose initial phrase is syntactically similar or dissimilar to that of the prime sentence produced on the previous trial. In the first experiment it is shown that a syntactically related prime sentence speeds onset latencies to a subsequent target sentence by approximately 50 ms relative to a syntactically unrelated prime sentence. In the second experiment, the cost of the process of lemma access is factored out via a picture previewing technique but a priming effect is still obtained demonstrating that the effect is not a product of the priming of lemma access processes. In Experiment 3, the related and unrelated prime trials feature the same picture display but the 50 ms facilitation effect is still observed indicating that the effect does not result from the priming of visual perception of the picture movements. This is further strengthened in Experiment 4 which uses written prime sentences rather than a picture description task on the prime trial and still obtains a facilitation effect. In Experiment 5, the effect disappears when the participants are instructed to name the movements but not the objects depicted in the array and this is interpreted as evidence against the view that the effect results from the conceptualization of the events depicted by the array. In the final experiment, the scope of the syntactic persistence effect is investigated by priming sentences with initial phrases of varying syntactic complexity. Significant priming is only observed for an initial phrase featuring two nouns - a finding consistent with the view that the syntactic persistence effect applies only to the generation of the first phrase of an utterance prior to speech onset. The implications of these results are analyzed in the final discussion section.
六个实验通过图片描述任务在线研究句法启动效应。在该任务中,参与者生成目标句子,其起始短语在句法上与前一次试验中生成的启动句相似或不同。在第一个实验中,结果表明,与句法不相关的启动句相比,句法相关的启动句使后续目标句子的起始潜伏期加快了约50毫秒。在第二个实验中,通过图片预览技术排除了词元提取过程的成本,但仍获得了启动效应,这表明该效应不是词元提取过程启动的产物。在实验3中,相关和不相关的启动试验具有相同的图片显示,但仍观察到50毫秒的促进效应,这表明该效应不是由图片运动的视觉感知启动所导致的。在实验4中进一步得到证实,该实验在启动试验中使用书面启动句而非图片描述任务,仍获得了促进效应。在实验5中,当参与者被指示说出阵列中描绘的动作而非物体时,该效应消失了,这被解释为反对该效应是由阵列所描绘事件的概念化导致这一观点的证据。在最后一个实验中,通过用句法复杂度不同的起始短语启动句子来研究句法持续效应的范围。仅在具有两个名词的起始短语中观察到显著的启动效应——这一发现与句法持续效应仅适用于言语开始前话语第一个短语的生成这一观点一致。在最后的讨论部分分析了这些结果的意义。