Branigan H P, Pickering M J, Stewart A J, McLean J F
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1297-302. doi: 10.3758/bf03211830.
Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.
目前关于句法启动效应持久性的证据(博克,1986年)并不明确:博克和格里芬(2000年)通过口语图片描述发现,这种效应在多达10次试验中持续存在;而布兰尼根、皮克林和克莱兰(1999年)使用书面句子完成任务时发现,即使在启动句和目标句之间插入一个句子,这种效应也会消失。本文探讨了导致其持久的原因。一种观点认为,布兰尼根等人所证明的快速衰退是因为任务强调概念规划;另一种观点则认为,这是由于他们任务的书面性质所致。如果概念规划是原因,那么这可能与规划启动句或规划插入句有关。因此,我们进行了一项口语句子完成实验,对比了无延迟、插入一个句子和纯粹的时间延迟三种情况。结果表明,在所有三种情况下都出现了强烈且相似的启动效应,因此支持了口语启动效应具有持久性这一观点。