• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用新旧诊断标准的糖尿病与老年男性和女性新发冠状动脉事件发生率的关联。

Association of diabetes mellitus using old and new diagnostic criteria with incidence of new coronary events in older men and women.

作者信息

Aronow W S, Ahn C

机构信息

Hebrew Hospital Home, Bronx, New York 10475, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Jan 1;85(1):104-5, A8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00616-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00616-5
PMID:11078247
Abstract

A prospective study investigated in 952 men (mean age 79 years) and in 2,014 women (mean age 81 years), the association of diabetes mellitus using the old and new diagnostic criteria with the incidence of new coronary events. At 40-month follow-up for men and 44-month follow-up for women, whether the old or the new criteria for diagnosing diabetes mellitus were used, diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with the incidence of new coronary events (p <0.0001) in older men and women.

摘要

一项前瞻性研究在952名男性(平均年龄79岁)和2014名女性(平均年龄81岁)中,调查了使用新旧诊断标准的糖尿病与新发冠状动脉事件发生率之间的关联。在对男性进行40个月随访和对女性进行44个月随访时,无论使用旧的还是新的糖尿病诊断标准,糖尿病都与老年男性和女性新发冠状动脉事件的发生率显著相关(p<0.0001)。

相似文献

1
Association of diabetes mellitus using old and new diagnostic criteria with incidence of new coronary events in older men and women.采用新旧诊断标准的糖尿病与老年男性和女性新发冠状动脉事件发生率的关联。
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Jan 1;85(1):104-5, A8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00616-5.
2
Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of coronary heart disease: results of the 10-year follow-up of the PROCAM study.2型糖尿病与冠心病风险:PROCAM研究10年随访结果
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Apr;14(2):230-6. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3280142037.
3
Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. The DECODE study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis Of Diagnostic criteria in Europe.葡萄糖耐量与死亡率:世界卫生组织和美国糖尿病协会诊断标准的比较。DECODE研究组。欧洲糖尿病流行病学组。欧洲糖尿病流行病学:诊断标准协作分析。
Lancet. 1999 Aug 21;354(9179):617-21.
4
Cardiovascular disease in older adults with glucose disorders: comparison of American Diabetes Association criteria for diabetes mellitus with WHO criteria.患有血糖紊乱的老年人的心血管疾病:美国糖尿病协会糖尿病标准与世界卫生组织标准的比较
Lancet. 1999 Aug 21;354(9179):622-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12030-5.
5
Usefulness of fasting plasma glucose to predict mortality or coronary heart disease in persons > or = 60 years of age without diabetes mellitus or in those with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (from The Dubbo Study).空腹血糖在预测60岁及以上无糖尿病或未诊断出糖尿病患者的死亡率或冠心病方面的效用(来自达博研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Oct 1;102(7):831-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.030. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
6
Fasting glucose levels, incident diabetes, subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in apparently healthy adults: A 12-year longitudinal study.健康成年人的空腹血糖水平、新发糖尿病、亚临床动脉粥样硬化和心血管事件:一项为期12年的纵向研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2016 Nov;13(6):429-437. doi: 10.1177/1479164116653356. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Consequences of the new diagnostic criteria for diabetes in older men and women. DECODE Study (Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe).老年男性和女性糖尿病新诊断标准的后果。DECODE研究(糖尿病流行病学:欧洲诊断标准协作分析)。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Oct;22(10):1667-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.10.1667.
8
Revision of diagnostic criteria for diabetes.糖尿病诊断标准的修订。
Lancet. 1996 Dec 14;348(9042):1657-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65719-4.
9
Clinical impact of borderline and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病患者中边缘性和未诊断糖尿病的临床影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Dec 15;86(12):1363-6, A4-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01244-3.
10
Diabetes, mortality and coronary heart disease in the prospective Dubbo study of Australian elderly.
Aust N Z J Med. 1996 Feb;26(1):66-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1996.tb02909.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The gender specific frequency of risk factor and CHD diagnoses prior to incident MI: a community study.心肌梗死发病前危险因素及冠心病诊断的性别特异性频率:一项社区研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Apr 4;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-18.