Suppr超能文献

对疑似阑尾炎患者选择性使用诊断性腹腔镜检查。

Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis.

作者信息

van den Broek W T, Bijnen A B, van Eerten P V, de Ruiter P, Gouma D J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Secretariaat Chirurgie, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):938-41. doi: 10.1007/s004640000226.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic laparoscopy has been introduced as a new diagnostic tool for patients with acute appendicitis. We performed diagnostic laparoscopy when the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis was in doubt. The aims of this study were to evaluate this strategy and to analyze the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients referred to our hospital with suspected appendicitis during the period 1994-1997 were evaluated prospectively. The clinical diagnosis was determined by the surgeon or resident on call based on the patient's history, physical examination, and leukocyte count. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1: appendicitis not likely. These patients were observed for 24 h or discharged. When they showed signs of appendicitis in 24 h, they were transferred to either group 2 or 3; group 2: doubt concerning diagnosis. These patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and appendectomy was performed if indicated; group 3: In these patients the diagnosis appendicitis was felt to be certain. They were treated by primary appendectomy by an open procedure. In this study, 1,050 patients, 531 women (51%), 389 men (37%), and 130 children (12%) <11 yrs, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Altogether, 377 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed, leaving 109 healthy-looking appendices in place. This reduced the negative appendectomy rate from 25% to 14% in all surgically managed patients. The negative appendectomy rate for the women in group 2 was reduced from 49% to 14%, and for the men from 22% to 11%, so it also seemed worthwhile to perform diagnostic laparoscopy in men. Because the appendix sana was left in place in only three children, the benefit from laparoscopy is relatively small for children. In 48% of these patients a second diagnosis was obtained, most of them gynecologic in nature. There were no false-negative laparoscopies and no complications resulting from the laparoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe procedure that reduced the appendix sana rate without increasing the total number of operations. It is a useful method for obtaining other, mostly gynecologic, diagnoses. To further reduce the appendix sana rate, better criteria for laparoscopic assessment of the appendix are needed.

摘要

背景

诊断性腹腔镜检查已作为一种用于急性阑尾炎患者的新诊断工具被引入。当阑尾炎的临床诊断存疑时,我们会进行诊断性腹腔镜检查。本研究的目的是评估这一策略,并分析诊断性腹腔镜检查对疑似阑尾炎患者的疗效。

患者与方法

对1994年至1997年期间转诊至我院的所有疑似阑尾炎患者进行前瞻性评估。临床诊断由主刀外科医生或值班住院医生根据患者的病史、体格检查和白细胞计数来确定。患者被分为三组:第一组:阑尾炎可能性不大。这些患者观察24小时或出院。若他们在24小时内出现阑尾炎症状,则被转至第二组或第三组;第二组:诊断存疑。这些患者接受诊断性腹腔镜检查,如有指征则行阑尾切除术;第三组:这些患者被认为阑尾炎诊断明确。他们通过开放手术接受一期阑尾切除术。在本研究中,共评估了1050例患者,其中女性531例(51%),男性389例(37%),130例儿童(12%)年龄小于11岁。

结果

总共进行了377例诊断性腹腔镜检查,有109个外观正常的阑尾被保留。这使得所有接受手术治疗患者的阴性阑尾切除率从25%降至14%。第二组女性的阴性阑尾切除率从49%降至14%,男性从22%降至11%,所以对男性进行诊断性腹腔镜检查似乎也很有价值。由于只有3例儿童的正常阑尾被保留,腹腔镜检查对儿童的益处相对较小。在这些患者中,48%获得了第二种诊断,其中大多数是妇科疾病。没有腹腔镜检查假阴性情况,也没有因腹腔镜手术导致的并发症。

结论

诊断性腹腔镜检查是一种安全的操作,可降低正常阑尾切除率且不增加手术总数。它是获得其他诊断(大多为妇科诊断)的有用方法。为进一步降低正常阑尾切除率,需要更好的腹腔镜评估阑尾的标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验