Barrat C, Catheline J M, Rizk N, Champault G G
Université Paris XIII, EFR de Médecine de Bobigny, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999 Jan;9(1):27-31.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic appendicectomy on the incidence of histologically normal appendices. Between 1987 and 1997, 1,220 patients (average age 23.5 years [17-73]; 841 women [69%]) had appendicectomy due to the presence of at least one of the following three criteria: right iliac fossa guarding, fever >38 degrees C, and leukocytosis >10,000. Patients were divided into two groups: one group of 930 patients were operated on using the classic Mac Burney approach and the other group of 355 patients underwent laparoscopic exploration, with an appendicectomy performed if macroscopic abnormalities were observed (290 cases). In all cases, the appendices were examined blind and classified as normal or pathologic, with the latter divided with respect to the nature and severity of the lesions. In the Mac Burney group, the incidence of histologically normal appendices was 25.1%. In the laparoscopic group, the incidence was only 8.2% (p=0.015). The types of pathologic appendices were identical between the two groups. In 65 cases (18.3%), a macroscopically normal appendix was left in place. In 56 cases the symptoms were due to another identified cause, however, in 10 cases no cause was found. All patients were followed-up for an average of 3 years. One patient (1.8%) had a second operation (an appendicectomy), which revealed minor histologic lesions. The problem is the inability of the operator to differentiate between a healthy and a pathologic appendix on laparoscopy. The risk of false-positives and false-negatives is approximately 10%. Diagnostic difficulties usually occur in the initial phase of the disease with acute mucosal involvement in a morphologically normal appendix. At this stage the outcome cannot be predicted, although appropriate antibiotic treatment can be effective. This study shows that laparoscopy significantly reduces the number of histologically normal appendices as compared to a conventional Mac Burney operation. This can only be achieved by not removing macroscopically normal appendices, a small proportion of which (5-10%) could be cases of early appendicitis with only mucosal involvement. In the absence of other causes of the symptoms, a 3-day course of antibiotics can be tried to treat possible mucosal lesions. This approach reduces costs without having adverse consequences on the outcome.
本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术对组织学正常阑尾发生率的影响。1987年至1997年间,1220例患者(平均年龄23.5岁[17 - 73岁];841名女性[69%])因存在以下三项标准中的至少一项而接受阑尾切除术:右下腹压痛、体温>38摄氏度以及白细胞增多>10000。患者被分为两组:一组930例患者采用经典的麦氏切口进行手术,另一组355例患者接受腹腔镜探查,若观察到宏观异常则进行阑尾切除术(290例)。在所有病例中,阑尾均在盲视下进行检查,并分为正常或病理性,后者根据病变的性质和严重程度进一步分类。在麦氏切口组中,组织学正常阑尾的发生率为25.1%。在腹腔镜组中,该发生率仅为8.2%(p = 0.015)。两组病理性阑尾的类型相同。在65例(18.3%)病例中,肉眼正常的阑尾被保留。在56例病例中,症状是由另一个已确定的原因引起的,然而,在10例病例中未发现病因。所有患者平均随访3年。1例患者(1.8%)接受了二次手术(阑尾切除术),术中发现轻微组织学病变。问题在于手术医生在腹腔镜检查时无法区分健康阑尾和病理性阑尾。假阳性和假阴性的风险约为10%。诊断困难通常发生在疾病的初始阶段,此时形态正常的阑尾出现急性黏膜受累。在此阶段,尽管适当的抗生素治疗可能有效,但结果无法预测。本研究表明,与传统的麦氏手术相比,腹腔镜检查显著减少了组织学正常阑尾的数量。这只能通过不切除肉眼正常阑尾来实现,其中一小部分(5 - 10%)可能是仅黏膜受累的早期阑尾炎病例。在没有其他症状原因的情况下,可以尝试使用3天疗程的抗生素来治疗可能的黏膜病变。这种方法降低了成本,且对结果没有不良影响。