Casselman F P, Tan E S, Vermeulen F E, Kelder J C, Morshuis W J, Schepens M A
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St. Antoniusziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Oct;70(4):1227-33. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01966-4.
The aim of this study was to determine the durability of aortic valve preservation and root reconstruction in type A aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic root.
From November 1976 to February 1999, 246 patients underwent surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection at our institution. In 121 patients (49%), all with acute type A dissection and aortic root involvement, the aortic valve was preserved and one or more of the sinuses of Valsalva were reconstructed. The mean age of this group was 59 +/- 11 years and 70 (58%) were men. Thirty patients (25%) were operated in cardiogenic shock. Criteria for aortic root reconstruction were technical feasibility and surgeon preference. Techniques used for reconstruction were valve resuspension in all patients and additional reinforcement of the aortic root with Teflon (L.R. Bard, Tempe, AZ) felt (n = 21), gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde-glue (GRF-glue, Fii, Saint-Just-Malmont, France) (n = 103), or fibrinous glue (Tissu-col, Immuno AG, Vienna, Austria) (n = 5). Mean follow-up was 43.5 +/- 46 months.
The operative mortality was 21.5% (n = 26). Actuarial survival was 72% +/- 4%, 64% +/- 5%, and 53% +/- 6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Median aortic regurgitation in patients with retained native aortic valve at follow-up was 1+. All root reoperations included aortic valve replacement (n = 12). Freedom from aortic root reoperation was 95% +/- 2% at 1 year, 89% +/- 4% at 5 years, and 69% +/- 9% at 10 years. The incidence of aortic root reoperation was 23%, 11%, and 40%, respectively, when Teflon felt, GRF-glue, and fibrinous glue were used for root reconstruction. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed the use of fibrinous glue (RR = 8.7; p = 0.03) as well as the presence of an aortic valve annulus more than 27 mm (RR = 4.2; p = 0.04) as independent risk factors for aortic root reoperation.
Aortic valve preservation in acute type A dissection provides relatively durable results. The use of fibrinous glue for root reconstruction seems to compromise the long-term durability of the repair compared with Teflon felt and GRF-glue. A dilated aortic annulus requires a more extensive root procedure.
本研究的目的是确定在累及主动脉根部的A型主动脉夹层中主动脉瓣保留和根部重建的耐久性。
1976年11月至1999年2月,我院246例患者接受了急性A型主动脉夹层的手术治疗。121例患者(49%)均为急性A型夹层且累及主动脉根部,保留了主动脉瓣并重建了一个或多个主动脉窦。该组患者的平均年龄为59±11岁,70例(58%)为男性。30例患者(25%)在心源性休克状态下接受手术。主动脉根部重建的标准是技术可行性和外科医生的偏好。重建所采用的技术为所有患者均进行瓣膜再悬吊,并使用特氟龙(L.R. Bard,亚利桑那州坦佩)毡片对主动脉根部进行额外加固(n = 21)、使用明胶 - 间苯二酚 - 甲醛胶(GRF胶,Fii,法国圣朱斯特 - 马尔蒙)(n = 103)或纤维蛋白胶(组织黏合剂,Immuno AG,奥地利维也纳)(n = 5)。平均随访时间为43.5±46个月。
手术死亡率为21.5%(n = 26)。1年、5年和10年的精算生存率分别为72%±4%、64%±5%和53%±6%。随访时保留自体主动脉瓣患者的主动脉瓣反流中位数为1+。所有根部再次手术均包括主动脉瓣置换(n = 12)。1年、5年和10年无主动脉根部再次手术的比例分别为95%±2%、89%±4%和69%±9%。当使用特氟龙毡片、GRF胶和纤维蛋白胶进行根部重建时,主动脉根部再次手术的发生率分别为23%、11%和40%。多因素Cox比例风险分析显示,使用纤维蛋白胶(RR = 8.7;p = 0.03)以及主动脉瓣环直径大于27 mm(RR = 4.2;p = 0.04)是主动脉根部再次手术的独立危险因素。
急性A型夹层中保留主动脉瓣可提供相对持久的效果。与特氟龙毡片和GRF胶相比,使用纤维蛋白胶进行根部重建似乎会损害修复的长期耐久性。主动脉瓣环扩张需要更广泛的根部手术。