Anderson M C, Bjork E L, Bjork R A
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403-1227, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):522-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03214366.
Previous work has shown that recalling information from long-term memory can impair the long-term retention of related representations--a phenomenon known as retrieval-induced forgetting (Anderson, Bjork, & Bjork, 1994). We report an experiment in which the question of whether retrieval is necessary to induce this form of impairment was examined. All the subjects studied six members from each of eight taxonomic categories (e.g., fruit orange). In the competitive practice condition, the subjects practiced recalling three of the six members, using category-stem cues (e.g., fruit or__). In the noncompetitive practice condition, the subjects were reexposed to these same members for the same number of repetitions but were asked to recall the category name by using the exemplar and a stem as cues (e.g., fr__orange). Despite significant and comparable facilitation of practiced items in both conditions, only the competitive practice subjects were impaired in their ability to recall the nonpracticed members on a delayed cued-recall test. These findings argue that retrieval-induced forgetting is not caused by increased competition arising from the strengthening of practiced items, but by inhibitory processes specific to the situation of recall.
先前的研究表明,从长期记忆中提取信息会损害相关表征的长期保持——这一现象被称为提取诱发遗忘(安德森、比约克和比约克,1994年)。我们报告了一项实验,该实验检验了提取是否是诱发这种形式损害的必要条件这一问题。所有受试者学习了八个分类类别中每个类别的六个成员(例如,水果——橙子)。在竞争练习条件下,受试者使用类别词干线索(例如,水果or__)练习回忆六个成员中的三个。在非竞争练习条件下,受试者以相同的重复次数再次接触这些相同的成员,但被要求使用示例和词干作为线索回忆类别名称(例如,fr__橙子)。尽管在两种条件下练习项目都得到了显著且相当的促进,但只有竞争练习组的受试者在延迟线索回忆测试中回忆未练习成员的能力受到了损害。这些发现表明,提取诱发遗忘不是由练习项目强化导致的竞争加剧引起的,而是由回忆情境特有的抑制过程引起的。