Anderson M C, Bjork R A, Bjork E L
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1563.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Sep;20(5):1063-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.5.1063.
Three studies show that the retrieval process itself causes long-lasting forgetting. Ss studied 8 categories (e.g., Fruit). Half the members of half the categories were then repeatedly practiced through retrieval tests (e.g., Fruit Or_____). Category-cued recall of unpracticed members of practiced categories was impaired on a delayed test. Experiments 2 and 3 identified 2 significant features of this retrieval-induced forgetting: The impairment remains when output interference is controlled, suggesting a retrieval-based suppression that endures for 20 min or more, and the impairment appears restricted to high-frequency members. Low-frequency members show little impairment, even in the presence of strong, practiced competitors that might be expected to block access to those items. These findings suggest a critical role for suppression in models of retrieval inhibition and implicate the retrieval process itself in everyday forgetting.
三项研究表明,检索过程本身会导致长期遗忘。被试学习了8个类别(如水果)。然后,通过检索测试对一半类别的一半成员进行重复练习(如水果或_____)。在延迟测试中,对已练习类别的未练习成员进行类别线索回忆时受到了损害。实验2和实验3确定了这种检索诱导遗忘的两个显著特征:当输出干扰得到控制时,损害仍然存在,这表明基于检索的抑制会持续20分钟或更长时间,并且损害似乎仅限于高频成员。低频成员几乎没有受到损害,即使存在可能会阻止访问这些项目的强大的、已练习过的竞争项目。这些发现表明抑制在检索抑制模型中起着关键作用,并表明检索过程本身在日常遗忘中也有影响。