Butler K M, Williams C C, Zacks R T, Maki R H
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1314-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1314.
Retrieving some members of a memory set impairs later recall of semantically related but not unrelated members (M. C. Anderson, R. A. Bjork, & E. L. Bjork, 1994; M. C. Anderson & B. A. Spellman, 1995). The authors investigated whether this retrieval-induced forgetting effect would generalize to testing procedures other than category-cued recall. Although the authors demonstrated a retrieval-induced forgetting effect using a category-cued recall task, they failed to show retrieval-induced forgetting on several different memory tests that used item-specific cues, including a category-plus-stem-cued recall test, a category-plus-fragment-cued recall test, a fragment-cued recall test, and a fragment completion task.
提取记忆集中的某些成员会损害后来对语义相关但非无关成员的回忆(M.C. 安德森、R.A. 比约克和E.L. 比约克,1994年;M.C. 安德森和B.A. 斯佩尔曼,1995年)。作者研究了这种提取诱发遗忘效应是否会推广到类别线索回忆之外的测试程序。尽管作者使用类别线索回忆任务证明了提取诱发遗忘效应,但他们未能在使用项目特定线索的几种不同记忆测试中显示出提取诱发遗忘,这些测试包括类别加词干线索回忆测试、类别加片段线索回忆测试、片段线索回忆测试和片段完成任务。