Torgersen S, Lygren S, Oien P A, Skre I, Onstad S, Edvardsen J, Tambs K, Kringlen E
Department of Psychology, Oslo University, Norway.
Compr Psychiatry. 2000 Nov-Dec;41(6):416-25. doi: 10.1053/comp.2000.16560.
No twin study has previously investigated the whole range of personality disorders (PDs) recorded by interviews. Based on twin and patient registries, 92 monozygotic (MZ) and 129 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Observed prevalence rates from a normal population study of more than 2,000 individuals were used in combination with data from the present study to generate statistics assumed to be valid for a normal twin population, and these statistics were used for structural equation modeling. The best-fitting models had a heritability of .60 for PDs generally, .37 for the eccentric (A) cluster, .60 for the emotional (B) cluster, and .62 for the fearful (C) cluster. Among the specific PDs, the heritability appeared to be .79 for narcissistic, .78 for obsessive-compulsive, .69 for borderline, .67 for histrionic, .61 for schizotypal, .57 for dependent, .54 for self-defeating, .29 for schizoid, .28 for paranoid, and .28 for avoidant PDs. The best-fitting models never included shared-in-families environmental effects. However, a model with only shared familial and unique environmental effects could not be ruled out for dependent PD. Shared familial environmental effects may also influence the development of any PD and borderline PD. Passive-aggressive PD did not seem to be affected by genes or family environment at all. The low occurrence of antisocial PD in the twin sample precluded any model for this disorder. PDs seem to be more strongly influenced by genetic effects than almost any axis I disorder, and more than most broad personality dimensions. However, we observed a large variation in heritability among the different PDs, probably partly because of a moderate sample size and low prevalence of the specific disorders.
此前尚无双胞胎研究对通过访谈记录的所有类型人格障碍(PDs)进行调查。基于双胞胎和患者登记信息,采用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版人格障碍结构化临床访谈》(SCID-II)对92对同卵双胞胎(MZ)和129对异卵双胞胎(DZ)进行了访谈。将来自一项超过2000人的正常人群研究中观察到的患病率与本研究的数据相结合,以生成假定对正常双胞胎人群有效的统计数据,并将这些统计数据用于结构方程建模。最佳拟合模型显示,人格障碍总体遗传度为0.60,怪异(A)类群为0.37,情感(B)类群为0.60,恐惧(C)类群为0.62。在特定的人格障碍中,自恋型人格障碍的遗传度为0.79,强迫型人格障碍为0.78,边缘型人格障碍为0.69,表演型人格障碍为0.67,分裂型人格障碍为0.61,依赖型人格障碍为0.57,自我挫败型人格障碍为0.54,分裂样人格障碍为0.29,偏执型人格障碍为0.28,回避型人格障碍为0.28。最佳拟合模型从未包含家庭共享环境效应。然而,对于依赖型人格障碍,不能排除仅包含家庭共享和独特环境效应的模型。家庭共享环境效应也可能影响任何人格障碍和边缘型人格障碍的发展。被动攻击型人格障碍似乎根本不受基因或家庭环境的影响。双胞胎样本中反社会人格障碍发生率较低,无法对该障碍建立任何模型。人格障碍似乎比几乎任何轴I障碍都更受遗传效应的强烈影响,也比大多数广泛的人格维度更受影响。然而,我们观察到不同人格障碍之间的遗传度存在很大差异,这可能部分是由于样本量适中以及特定障碍的患病率较低。