• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subtle sex bias in empathy and helping behavior.

作者信息

Oswald P A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Iona College, New Rochelle, NY 10801, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2000 Oct;87(2):545-51. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.2.545.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.2000.87.2.545
PMID:11086602
Abstract

The present study examined the influences on empathy and altruism of sex of participant, the affective demeanor (positive or negative) and cognitive processes (positive or negative) displayed by a female target in a video, and the perspective-taking focus of participants. The latter variable is related to the affective or cognitive response to the target's portrayal, or the response to technical aspects of the video (nonperspective-taking). Empathy was measured using Batson's Empathy Adjectives (1987) and altruism was measured by participants' written responses, which indicated how many hours they were willing to volunteer to help persons similar to the target. An ethnically diverse sample of working adults (M age = 31.6 yr., SD = 8.2) participated. Analysis yielded a subtle difference between groups. Men reported feeling more empathy for a confused, unfocused, illogical woman target, whereas women felt more empathy for a focused, clear, logical woman target. Moreover, there was a significant relationship between sex and helping--men offered more help than women.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subtle sex bias in empathy and helping behavior.
Psychol Rep. 2000 Oct;87(2):545-51. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.2.545.
2
The interactive effects of affective demeanor, cognitive processes, and perspective-taking focus on helping behavior.情感态度、认知过程和观点采择的交互作用聚焦于助人行为。
J Soc Psychol. 2002 Feb;142(1):120-32. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603890.
3
The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping.认知和情感观点采择对共情关注和利他帮助的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;136(5):613-23. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714045.
4
"I help because I want to, not because you tell me to": empathy increases autonomously motivated helping.“我帮忙是因为我想帮,而不是因为你叫我帮”:同理心会自动增加自主助人的动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):681-9. doi: 10.1177/0146167211435940. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
5
Does the interpersonal Reactivity Index Perspective-taking scale predict who will volunteer time to counsel adults entering college?人际反应指针观点采择量表能否预测谁会自愿花时间为刚进入大学的成年人提供咨询服务?
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Dec;97(3 Pt 2):1184-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1184.
6
Empathy-motivated helping: the moderating role of group membership.同理心驱动的帮助行为:群体成员身份的调节作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Jul;32(7):943-56. doi: 10.1177/0146167206287363.
7
Helpful only in the abstract?仅在理论上有用?
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):191-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02265.x. Epub 2009 Jan 3.
8
Grouping of children's helping behaviour.儿童助人行为的分组
Psychol Rep. 1992 Dec;71(3 Pt 1):747-53. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3.747.
9
Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective.宜人性、同理心与助人行为:一种人×情境视角
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):583-99. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583.
10
Subtle prejudice against women in The Netherlands.荷兰存在对女性的微妙偏见。
J Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;135(5):601-6. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9712233.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropsychological mechanisms of observational learning in human placebo effects.人类安慰剂效应中观察学习的神经心理学机制。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 May;242(5):889-900. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06608-7. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Measuring In-Group and Out-Group Helping in Communal Living: Helping and Substance Abuse Recovery.衡量群体内与群体外互助行为在社区生活中的作用:互助与药物滥用康复
J Groups Addict Recover. 2009 Jan;4(1-2):110-128. doi: 10.1080/15560350802712488.