• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Validation of selected donor-screening questions: structure, content, and comprehension.

作者信息

Orton S L, Virvos V J, Williams A E

机构信息

Jerome Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2000 Nov;40(11):1407-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40111407.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40111407.x
PMID:11099673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Donor questioning is an integral component of blood safety, designed to identify and interdict donors considered to be at elevated risk of transfusion-transmissible infection. Questions are frequently added to this screening procedure, but they are rarely evaluated for comprehension.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Seven American Red Cross blood donor history questions were selected for evaluation. Focus groups were conducted using individuals from high school/college, church, business, and other sources, who had never donated blood. Both sexes and various age and racial groups were represented. The donation process and regulatory requirements or guidelines were explained. Participants were asked to consider 1) content, 2) clarity 3) likelihood of asking for more information, 4) suggestions for improvement, and 5) how a need for clarifying information would best be met.

RESULTS

Constructive, helpful, and consistent comments obtained might be utilized in revising questions.

CONCLUSION

Focus group discussions can be useful in providing guidance for developing screening questions that can be easily understood.

摘要

相似文献

1
Validation of selected donor-screening questions: structure, content, and comprehension.
Transfusion. 2000 Nov;40(11):1407-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40111407.x.
2
[Lack of knowledge among blood donors in Burkina Faso (West Africa); potential obstacle to transfusion security].[布基纳法索(西非)献血者知识匮乏;输血安全的潜在障碍]
Transfus Clin Biol. 2007 Nov;14(5):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
Estimates of infectious disease risk factors in US blood donors. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.美国献血者传染病风险因素的评估。逆转录病毒流行病学供血者研究。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 26;277(12):967-72.
4
Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey.走近献血者——英国献血者调查的理由、方法及参与者概述
Transfus Med. 2015 Aug;25(4):265-75. doi: 10.1111/tme.12236. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Evaluation of a new German blood donor questionnaire.评价一种新的德国献血者问卷。
Vox Sang. 2014 Jan;106(1):55-60. doi: 10.1111/vox.12088. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and blood transfusion: results of the UK Transfusion Medicine Epidemiological Review study.克雅氏病与输血:英国输血医学流行病学回顾研究结果
Vox Sang. 2006 Oct;91(3):221-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00833.x.
7
[Attitudes, beliefs, and motivations in blood donors and non-donors].献血者与非献血者的态度、信念及动机
Sangre (Barc). 1996 Dec;41(6):427-40.
8
Understanding the meaning of permanent deferral for blood donors.了解献血者永久延期的含义。
Transfusion. 2008 Jan;48(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01483.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
9
Donor understanding and attitudes about current and potential deferral criteria for high-risk sexual behavior.供者对当前和潜在的高风险性行为延迟标准的理解和态度。
Transfusion. 2011 Aug;51(8):1829-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03078.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
10
Potential increased risk of virus transmission due to exclusion of older donors because of concern over Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.
Transfusion. 1997 Oct;37(10):996-1002. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.371098016436.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Hepatitis B and C Among Blood Donors and Nondonors in North India.印度北部献血者和非献血者对乙型和丙型肝炎的认知与态度
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019 May-Jun;9(3):318-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
2
Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Viral Markers in Blood Donors Deferred from Donating Blood on the Basis of a History of Jaundice of Unknown Origin.基于不明原因黄疸病史而延期献血的献血者中乙型和丙型肝炎病毒标志物的流行情况。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;9(2):156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Comparative Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Assay and Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay for the Screening of Hepatitis C.
用于丙型肝炎筛查的电化学发光测定法与化学发光微粒子免疫测定法的比较分析
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019 Jan;35(1):131-136. doi: 10.1007/s12288-018-0968-3. Epub 2018 May 19.
4
Selecting the Right Donors - Still a Challenge: Development of a Uniform Donor Questionnaire in Germany.选择合适的捐赠者——仍是一项挑战:德国统一捐赠者调查问卷的制定
Transfus Med Hemother. 2017 Aug;44(4):255-262. doi: 10.1159/000479193. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
Psychosocial Variables of Voluntary Blood Donors at Blood Bank of a Medical College.某医学院血库中自愿献血者的心理社会变量
Med J Armed Forces India. 2005 Feb;61(2):130-2. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(05)80007-3. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
6
Normative evaluation of blood banks in the Brazilian Amazon region in respect to the prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria.巴西亚马逊地区血库在预防输血传播疟疾方面的规范性评估。
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
7
Sexual behaviour of Croatian blood donors as a threat to the health of blood recipients.克罗地亚献血者的性行为对血液受赠者的健康构成威胁。
Blood Transfus. 2011 Oct;9(4):407-12. doi: 10.2450/2011.0084-10. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
Managing recalls and withdrawals of blood components.管理血液成分的召回和退回。
Transfus Med Rev. 2004 Jan;18(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2003.10.005.