Noppeney U, Wallesch C W
Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Brain Cogn. 2000 Dec;44(3):367-86. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1999.1199.
Kurt Goldstein is regarded as one of the major proponents of the holistic movement at the beginning of the 20th century. He rejected the strong localization hypothesis in the field of aphasiology and attempted to link language disturbances to an underlying general intellectual impairment. Goldstein's criticism was based on his subtle symptomatology, his organismic biology, and his philosophical reflections. In his concept of abstract attitude Goldstein searched for a general psychological function that might explain a variety of aphasic symptoms. Abstract attitude bridges the gap between cognitive and linguistic structures. According to Goldstein, it is the basis for words to have a meaning, to be employed in a categorical sense. Since amnesic aphasics are confined to a concrete attitude, their words have lost their representational function. Although Goldstein's concept of abstract attitude is no longer used in scientific discourse, it is analyzed for its heuristic value. It led Goldstein to questions about the relation between cognition and language and to fragments of a semantic theory.
库尔特·戈尔茨坦被视为20世纪初整体运动的主要支持者之一。他拒绝了失语症学领域中强烈的定位假说,并试图将语言障碍与潜在的一般智力损伤联系起来。戈尔茨坦的批评基于他细致的症状学、他的机体生物学以及他的哲学思考。在他的抽象态度概念中,戈尔茨坦寻找一种可能解释各种失语症状的一般心理功能。抽象态度弥合了认知结构和语言结构之间的差距。根据戈尔茨坦的观点,它是词语具有意义并在分类意义上被使用的基础。由于遗忘性失语症患者局限于具体态度,他们的词语失去了其表征功能。尽管戈尔茨坦的抽象态度概念在科学论述中不再被使用,但因其启发价值而受到分析。它引导戈尔茨坦思考认知与语言之间的关系以及语义理论的片段。