Suppr超能文献

从神经心理学角度看现代人语言与实践的联系。

A neuropsychological perspective on the link between language and praxis in modern humans.

机构信息

Laboratory of Neurophysics and Physiology, University Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8119, 45 rue des Saints Pères, 75006 Paris, France.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 12;367(1585):144-60. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0122.

Abstract

Hypotheses about the emergence of human cognitive abilities postulate strong evolutionary links between language and praxis, including the possibility that language was originally gestural. The present review considers functional and neuroanatomical links between language and praxis in brain-damaged patients with aphasia and/or apraxia. The neural systems supporting these functions are predominantly located in the left hemisphere. There are many parallels between action and language for recognition, imitation and gestural communication suggesting that they rely partially on large, common networks, differentially recruited depending on the nature of the task. However, this relationship is not unequivocal and the production and understanding of gestural communication are dependent on the context in apraxic patients and remains to be clarified in aphasic patients. The phonological, semantic and syntactic levels of language seem to share some common cognitive resources with the praxic system. In conclusion, neuropsychological observations do not allow support or rejection of the hypothesis that gestural communication may have constituted an evolutionary link between tool use and language. Rather they suggest that the complexity of human behaviour is based on large interconnected networks and on the evolution of specific properties within strategic areas of the left cerebral hemisphere.

摘要

关于人类认知能力出现的假设,提出了语言和实践之间存在很强的进化联系,包括语言最初可能是手势的可能性。本综述考虑了语言和实践在患有失语症和/或运动障碍的脑损伤患者中的功能和神经解剖学联系。支持这些功能的神经系统主要位于左半球。动作和语言在识别、模仿和手势交流方面有许多相似之处,这表明它们部分依赖于大型的共同网络,根据任务的性质而有不同的招募。然而,这种关系并不是明确的,在运动障碍患者中,手势交流的产生和理解取决于上下文,在失语症患者中仍然需要澄清。语言的语音、语义和句法层面似乎与实践系统共享一些共同的认知资源。总之,神经心理学观察既不能支持也不能否定手势交流可能是工具使用和语言之间进化联系的假设。相反,它们表明,人类行为的复杂性基于大型的相互连接的网络,以及在左大脑半球的特定区域内的特定属性的进化。

相似文献

6
Apraxia and aphasia for a visual-gestural language.视觉手势语言的失用症和失语症。
Am J Physiol. 1984 Jun;246(6 Pt 2):R868-83. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1984.246.6.R868.
7
A discussion of apraxia, aphasia, and gestural language.关于失用症、失语症和手势语的讨论。
Am J Physiol. 1984 Jun;246(6 Pt 2):R884-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1984.246.6.R884.

引用本文的文献

2
Suggestions for Improving the Investigation of Gesture in Aphasia.改善失语症手势研究的建议。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Oct 4;64(10):4004-4013. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00125. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
What's in a Name? Conundrums Common to the Task-Specific Disorders.名字里有什么?特定任务障碍共有的难题。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Nov 8;5(6):573-574. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12684. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
7
Apraxia: Review and Update.失用症:综述与更新
J Clin Neurol. 2017 Oct;13(4):317-324. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.317.
10
A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.肢体失用症的认知概述
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Aug;16(8):75. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0675-0.

本文引用的文献

4
Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions.动作概念知识的神经关联。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):409-32. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000248.
5
Improving language without words: first evidence from aphasia.无词语言的改进:来自失语症的初步证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3824-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.025. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
6
Abstract structural representations of goal-directed behavior.目标导向行为的抽象结构表示。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1518-24. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383434. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
8
Impaired speech repetition and left parietal lobe damage.言语重复障碍与左顶叶损伤。
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11057-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1120-10.2010.
9
A review of conduction aphasia.传导性失语症述评。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2010 Nov;10(6):499-503. doi: 10.1007/s11910-010-0142-2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验