Suppr超能文献

1996年香港华人社区人群研究中糖尿病的患病率、与心血管危险因素的关联以及诊断标准(美国糖尿病协会1997年和世界卫生组织1998年)的影响。香港心血管危险因素指导委员会。美国糖尿病协会。

The prevalence of diabetes, association with cardiovascular risk factors and implications of diagnostic criteria (ADA 1997 and WHO 1998) in a 1996 community-based population study in Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Steering Committee. American Diabetes Association.

作者信息

Janus E D, Watt N M, Lam K S, Cockram C S, Siu S T, Liu L J, Lam T H

机构信息

Clinical Biochemistry Unit, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2000 Oct;17(10):741-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00376.x.

Abstract

AIMS

While the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 1997 diagnostic criteria advocate the use of fasting plasma glucose only, the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria retain the use of the standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The present study evaluated the relative merit of the respective diagnostic criteria in Chinese.

METHODS

Data collected for the Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study was analysed. This was a representative population-based study, conducted from 1995 to 1996 among 2,900 Chinese subjects aged 25-74 years using a 75-g OGTT.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes (known plus unknown) was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.3-7.1%), 9.2% (8.1-10.3%), and 9.8% (8.7-10.9%) based on ADA 1997, WHO 1985 and WHO 1998 criteria, respectively, with a very high prevalence in older subjects. The 2,451 subjects classified as normal under ADA 1997 criteria were heterogenous: 15.3% had impaired glucose tolerance; 2.1% had diabetes under WHO 1998 criteria. These latter two smaller groups had cardiovascular risk profiles comparable to that found among the impaired fasting glucose subjects (under ADA), but worse than that among the concordant normal glucose tolerance subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADA criteria underestimate both diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in this population. Hence fasting glucose alone is an inadequate approach and OGTT should be retained to identify at-risk individuals in both clinical diagnosis and epidemiological studies.

摘要

目的

美国糖尿病协会(ADA)1997年诊断标准提倡仅使用空腹血糖,而世界卫生组织(WHO)标准仍保留使用标准口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。本研究评估了这两种诊断标准在中国人群中的相对优势。

方法

分析了香港心血管危险因素患病率研究收集的数据。这是一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究,于1995年至1996年对2900名年龄在25 - 74岁的中国受试者进行,采用75克OGTT。

结果

根据ADA 1997年、WHO 1985年和WHO 1998年标准,糖尿病(已知和未知)的患病率分别为6.2%(95%置信区间5.3 - 7.1%)、9.2%(8.1 - 10.3%)和9.8%(8.7 - 10.9%),老年受试者患病率非常高。在ADA 1997年标准下被分类为正常的2451名受试者具有异质性:15.3%有糖耐量受损;根据WHO 1998年标准,2.1%患有糖尿病。后两个较小的组的心血管风险特征与空腹血糖受损受试者(根据ADA标准)相当,但比血糖耐量正常的一致受试者更差。

结论

ADA标准低估了该人群中的糖尿病患病率和心血管风险。因此,仅空腹血糖是一种不充分的方法,在临床诊断和流行病学研究中都应保留OGTT以识别高危个体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验