Fredman B, Zohar E, Tarabykin A, Shapiro A, Mayo A, Klein E, Jedeikin R
Department of Anesthesiology, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):189-93. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00036.
To assess the analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled bupivacaine wound instillation, 50 patients undergoing major intraabdominal surgery were enrolled into this prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. In all cases, a standard general anesthetic was administered. On completion of surgery, two multihole 20-gauge epidural catheters were tunneled through the proximal and distal apices of the surgical wound and placed above the fascia such that the tips were at the margin of the first and second thirds of the surgical wound, respectively. Postoperatively, a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device was connected to the instillation system. Either bupivacaine 0.25% (Bupivacaine Group) or an equal volume of sterile water (Control Group) was administered. The PCA device was programmed to deliver 9.0 mL with a 60-min lockout interval and no basal infusion. During the first six postoperative hours, a coinvestigator administered "rescue" morphine (2 mg IV). Thereafter, meperidine 1 mg/kg IM was administered on patient request for additional analgesia. Instillation attempts and actual number of injections were similar between the groups. The mean number of pump infusions and the mean "rescue" opioid requirements during the 24-h study period were similar between the groups. The total "rescue" morphine administered during the first six postoperative hours was 16 +/- 17 mg vs 18 +/- 14 mg for the Bupivacaine and Control Groups, respectively. The total meperidine administered during this period was 1.6 +/- 1.4 mg/kg and 2 +/- 1.2 mg/kg for the Bupivacaine and Control Groups, respectively. Preoperatively, hourly for the first six postoperative hours, and on removal of the instillation catheter, patient-generated visual analog scales for pain were similar at rest, on coughing, and after leg raise. In conclusion, bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic PCA device and a double-catheter system does not decrease postoperative opioid requirements after surgery performed through a midline incision.
After major abdominal surgery performed through a 20-cm incision, repeated 0.25% bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device and a double-catheter system does not decrease postoperative pain or opioid requirements.
为评估患者自控布比卡因伤口滴注的镇痛效果,50例接受腹部大手术的患者被纳入这项前瞻性、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。所有病例均给予标准全身麻醉。手术结束时,将两根20号多孔硬膜外导管经手术伤口的近端和远端顶点穿出,并置于筋膜上方,使导管尖端分别位于手术伤口前三分之一和中三分之一的边缘。术后,将患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置连接至滴注系统。给予0.25%布比卡因(布比卡因组)或等体积的无菌水(对照组)。PCA装置设置为每次输注9.0 mL,锁定时间间隔为60分钟,无基础输注量。术后前6小时,由一名共同研究者给予“解救”吗啡(静脉注射2 mg)。此后,根据患者要求给予哌替啶1 mg/kg肌肉注射以追加镇痛。两组间的滴注尝试次数和实际注射次数相似。在24小时研究期间,两组间的泵输注平均次数和“解救”阿片类药物的平均需求量相似。术后前6小时给予的“解救”吗啡总量,布比卡因组为16±17 mg,对照组为18±14 mg。在此期间给予的哌替啶总量,布比卡因组为1.6±1.4 mg/kg,对照组为2±1.2 mg/kg。术前、术后前6小时每小时以及拔除滴注导管时,患者静息、咳嗽及抬腿后产生的疼痛视觉模拟评分相似。总之,通过电子PCA装置和双导管系统进行布比卡因伤口滴注,在经中线切口进行手术后并不能减少术后阿片类药物的需求量。
在通过20 cm切口进行腹部大手术后,经电子患者自控镇痛装置和双导管系统反复进行0.25%布比卡因伤口滴注并不能减轻术后疼痛或减少阿片类药物的需求量。