Mendelsohn A L, Mogilner L N, Dreyer B P, Forman J A, Weinstein S C, Broderick M, Cheng K J, Magloire T, Moore T, Napier C
Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine and New York, New York, USA.
Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):130-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.130.
To determine the effect of a clinic-based literacy intervention on the language development of preschool children.
A convenience sample of families presenting to 2 urban pediatric clinics for well-child care met the following criteria: the family was Latino or black and English- or Spanish-speaking; the child was 2 to 5.9 years old, with no neurodevelopmental disability, at a gestational age of 34 weeks or more, and not attending kindergarten. Participants at the first clinic (intervention group) were exposed to a literacy support program, based on Reach Out and Read (ROR), during the previous 3 years. At the second clinic (comparison group), a similar program started 3 months before the study. Parent-child reading activities were measured using the READ Subscale of the StimQ. Language development was measured using the One-Word Expressive and Receptive Picture Vocabulary Tests, and was performed in the child's primary language.
A total of 122 study participants (49 interventions and 73 comparisons) met inclusion criteria and completed all measures. Intervention and comparison families were similar for most sociodemographic variables. Intervention families reported reading together with their children approximately 1 more day per week. Intensity of exposure to ROR (measured by total number of contacts with the program) was associated with increased parent-child reading activities, as measured by the StimQ-Read Subscale (r = 0.20). Intervention children had higher receptive language (mean: 94.5 vs 84.8) and expressive language (mean: 84.3 vs 81.6). After adjusting for potential confounders in a multiple regression analysis, intervention status was associated with an 8.6-point increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3, 14.0) in receptive language (semipartial correlation [SR]coefficient = 0.27), and a 4.3-point increase (95% CI: 0.04, 8.6) in expressive language (SR = 0.17). In a similar multiple regression, each contact with ROR was associated with an adjusted mean 0.4-point increase (95% CI: 0.1, 0.6) in receptive score, and an adjusted mean 0.21-point increase (95% CI: 0. 02, 0.4) in expressive score.
ROR is an important intervention, promoting parental literacy support and enhancing language development in impoverished preschool children. Integration of literacy promoting interventions such as these into routine pediatric health care for underserved populations can be recommended.
确定基于诊所的读写能力干预对学龄前儿童语言发展的影响。
在两家城市儿科诊所接受儿童健康检查的家庭组成的便利样本符合以下标准:家庭为拉丁裔或黑人,说英语或西班牙语;孩子年龄在2至5.9岁之间,无神经发育障碍,胎龄34周或以上,且未上幼儿园。第一家诊所的参与者(干预组)在过去3年中接受了基于“伸出手阅读”(ROR)的读写能力支持项目。在第二家诊所(对照组),一个类似的项目在研究开始前3个月启动。使用StimQ的READ子量表测量亲子阅读活动。使用单词表达和接受性图片词汇测试测量语言发展,并以孩子的主要语言进行。
共有122名研究参与者(49名干预组和73名对照组)符合纳入标准并完成了所有测量。干预组和对照组家庭在大多数社会人口统计学变量方面相似。干预组家庭报告每周与孩子一起阅读的天数大约多1天。通过StimQ-Read子量表测量,接触ROR的强度(通过与该项目的接触总数衡量)与亲子阅读活动增加相关(r = 0.20)。干预组儿童的接受性语言(平均值:94.5对84.8)和表达性语言(平均值:84.3对81.6)更高。在多元回归分析中对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,干预状态与接受性语言增加8.6分(95%置信区间[CI]:3.3,14.0)相关(半偏相关[SR]系数 = 0.27),与表达性语言增加4.3分(95%CI:0.04,8.6)相关(SR = 0.17)。在类似的多元回归中,每次与ROR接触与接受性得分调整后平均增加0.4分(95%CI:0.1,0.6)以及表达性得分调整后平均增加0.21分(95%CI:0.02,0.4)相关。
ROR是一项重要干预措施,可促进家长的读写能力支持并增强贫困学龄前儿童的语言发展。可以推荐将此类促进读写能力的干预措施纳入针对服务不足人群的常规儿科医疗保健中。