Suppr超能文献

父亲在 2 岁时的家庭阅读实践是否能预测孩子在 4 岁时的语言和读写能力?

Do Fathers' Home Reading Practices at Age 2 Predict Child Language and Literacy at Age 4?

机构信息

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Vic, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, Australia; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2018 Mar;18(2):179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal shared reading practices predict emergent literacy, but fathers' contributions are less certain. We examined whether fathers' shared home reading activities at 2 years predict language and emergent literacy at age 4 years, when controlling for maternal contributions; and whether this differentially benefits these outcomes in disadvantaged children.

METHODS

Two-parent families were recruited from 5 relatively disadvantaged communities for the universal Let's Read literacy promotion population-based trial (ISRCTN 04602902) in Melbourne, Australia. For exposure at 2 years, home reading practices were recorded via self-reported maternal and paternal StimQ-Toddler questionnaires and dichotomized at study median (high vs low). At 4 years, outcomes assessed included receptive and expressive language (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals 4) and emergent literacy (Sunderland Phonological Awareness Test-Revised). Linear regression, adjusted for mothers' home reading, was performed to assess 2-year-old vocabulary and communication skills and family disadvantage. Interaction of disadvantage (yes vs no) with high home reading by fathers and at least one parent was assessed.

RESULTS

Data were available for 405 families (64.3%). High father reading at 2 years (reference: low) predicted better expressive (mean difference, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 8.0) and receptive (mean difference, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 8.2) language at 4 years (both P < .001), but not emergent literacy skills. Similar patterns were observed in families with at least one parent with high home reading. Fathers' reading did not differentially benefit outcomes in disadvantaged children.

CONCLUSIONS

Fathers' involvement in reading at 2 years predicted better language but not emergent literacy at 4 years, and it did not protect against adverse effects of socioeconomic disadvantage.

摘要

背景

母亲的共同阅读实践可以预测早期读写能力,但父亲的贡献则不太确定。我们研究了在控制母亲贡献的情况下,父亲在 2 岁时的家庭共同阅读活动是否能预测 4 岁时的语言和早期读写能力;以及这种阅读活动是否会使处境不利的儿童在这些结果上获得不同程度的受益。

方法

在澳大利亚墨尔本,我们从 5 个相对贫困的社区招募了有两个家长的家庭,参加基于人群的普遍 Let's Read 扫盲促进的随机对照试验(ISRCTN 04602902)。为了评估 2 岁时的暴露情况,通过母亲和父亲的 StimQ-Toddler 自我报告问卷记录家庭阅读实践情况,并按研究中位数(高 vs 低)进行二分法处理。在 4 岁时,评估的结果包括接受性和表达性语言(临床语言基本要素评估 4)和早期读写能力(森德兰语音意识测试修订版)。进行线性回归,调整母亲的家庭阅读情况,以评估 2 岁时的词汇和沟通技能以及家庭劣势。评估了劣势(是/否)与父亲和至少一位家长的高家庭阅读之间的交互作用。

结果

共有 405 个家庭(64.3%)的数据可用。2 岁时父亲的高阅读(参考:低)预测了更好的表达性(平均差异,4.7;95%置信区间,1.5 至 8.0)和接受性(平均差异,5.0;95%置信区间,1.8 至 8.2)语言在 4 岁时(均 P<0.001),但对早期读写能力没有影响。在至少有一位家长高家庭阅读的家庭中也观察到了类似的模式。父亲的阅读并不能使处境不利儿童的结果得到不同程度的受益。

结论

父亲在 2 岁时的参与阅读可以预测 4 岁时的语言更好,但不能预测早期读写能力,而且它不能防止社会经济劣势的不利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验