Suppr超能文献

一项针对婴幼儿的通用共享阅读干预的四年期成果:“让我们阅读”试验

Four-year-old outcomes of a universal infant-toddler shared reading intervention: the let's read trial.

作者信息

Goldfeld Sharon, Quach Jon, Nicholls Ruth, Reilly Sheena, Ukoumunne Obioha C, Wake Melissa

机构信息

Royal Children’s Hospital, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Nov;166(11):1045-52. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the emergent literacy and language effects of a low-intensity literacy promotion program (Let's Read) provided via universal well-child services to parents during the first 4 years of their child's life.

DESIGN

Population-based, cluster randomized controlled trial performed between March 1, 2006, and December 10, 2010.

SETTING

Maternal and child health centers (clusters) in 5 relatively disadvantaged local government areas in Melbourne, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

All parents attending their 4-week well-child appointments in participating centers were invited to take part in the study.

INTERVENTION

The Let's Read program was delivered at 4, 12, 18, and 42 months during universal well-child care visits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Child emergent literacy skills (intrasyllabic, phonemic, and sound/letter knowledge) and language (core, receptive, and expressive), measured at 4 years of age.

RESULTS

A total of 630 parents participated, with 365 children in 32 intervention clusters and 265 children in 33 control clusters; 563 children (89.4%) were retained in the study to 4 years of age. The adjusted mean differences (intervention minus control) for emergent literacy was 0.2 (95% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .29) for intrasyllabic units, 0.05 (95% CI, -0.4 to 0.5; P = .85) for phonemic awareness, and 0.1 (95% CI, -1.5 to 1.6; P = .92) for letter knowledge. For language, the differences were 1.6 (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3; P = .25) for core, 0.8 (95% CI, -2.0 to 3.7; P = .56) for receptive, and 1.4 (95% CI, -1.4 to 4.2; P = .32) for expressive scores.

CONCLUSION

This population-wide primary care literacy promotion and book distribution program provided neither the anticipated benefits to literacy and language nor enhanced uptake of literacy activities at 4 years of age, even when targeted to relatively disadvantaged areas.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN04602902.

摘要

目的

确定在孩子出生后的头4年里,通过普遍的儿童健康服务向家长提供的低强度扫盲促进项目(“一起阅读”)对儿童早期读写能力和语言能力的影响。

设计

2006年3月1日至2010年12月10日期间进行的基于人群的整群随机对照试验。

地点

澳大利亚墨尔本5个相对贫困的地方政府区域的母婴健康中心(整群)。

参与者

所有在参与中心参加为期4周儿童健康检查的家长均被邀请参与研究。

干预措施

在儿童普遍健康检查期间,分别在4个月、12个月、18个月和42个月时实施“一起阅读”项目。

主要观察指标

在儿童4岁时测量其早期读写技能(音节内、音素和声音/字母知识)和语言能力(核心、接受性和表达性)。

结果

共有630名家长参与,32个干预组中有365名儿童,33个对照组中有265名儿童;563名儿童(89.4%)被保留在研究中至4岁。早期读写能力的调整后平均差异(干预组减去对照组),音节内单位为0.2(95%CI,-0.2至0.6;P = 0.29),音素意识为0.05(95%CI,-0.4至0.5;P = 0.85),字母知识为0.1(95%CI,-1.5至1.6;P = 0.92)。对于语言能力,核心能力差异为1.6(95%CI,-1.1至4.3;P = 0.25),接受性差异为0.8(95%CI,-2.0至3.7;P = 0.56),表达性分数差异为1.4(95%CI,-1.4至4.2;P = 0.32)。

结论

即使针对相对贫困地区,这个全人群的初级保健扫盲促进和图书分发项目既未给读写能力和语言能力带来预期益处,也未提高4岁儿童对读写活动的参与度。

试验注册

isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN04602902。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验