Suppr超能文献

低剂量米索前列醇与萘普生对比萘丁美酮预防非甾体抗炎药使用者复发性上消化道出血的随机试验

Randomized trial of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

作者信息

Chan F K, Sung J J, Ching J Y, Wu J C, Lee Y T, Leung W K, Hui Y, Chan L Y, Lai A C, Chung S C

机构信息

Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jan;15(1):19-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00890.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic misoprostol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with low gastric toxicity (nabumetone) has been shown to reduce mucosal injury.

AIM

To compare nabumetone vs. co-therapy of naproxen with low-dose misoprostol for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NSAID users.

METHODS

NSAID users presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled if they required long-term NSAIDs. After ulcer healing, they were randomized to receive: naproxen (500-1000 mg/day) and misoprostol (200 microg b.d.), or nabumetone (1000-1500 mg/day) and placebo misoprostol for 24 weeks. The primary end-point was recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The secondary end-point was the proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events including ulcer bleeding, symptomatic ulcers and severe dyspepsia.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (misoprostol/naproxen 45, nabumetone 45). Recurrent bleeding occurred in 10 patients (22.2%) receiving misoprostol/naproxen compared with three (6.7%) receiving nabumetone (relative risk 3.33, 95% CI: 0.98-11.32, P=0.069). The proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events at 24 weeks was 31.1% in the misoprostol/naproxen group and 28.9% in the nabumetone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Misoprostol/naproxen is not superior to nabumetone for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Neither low-dose misoprostol nor nabumetone is adequate for high-risk NSAID users.

摘要

背景

预防性使用米索前列醇或胃毒性低的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs,萘丁美酮)已被证明可减少黏膜损伤。

目的

比较萘丁美酮与萘普生联合小剂量米索前列醇用于NSAIDs使用者上消化道出血二级预防的效果。

方法

有上消化道出血且需要长期使用NSAIDs的患者纳入研究。溃疡愈合后,随机分为两组,分别接受:萘普生(500 - 1000毫克/天)和米索前列醇(200微克,每日两次),或萘丁美酮(1000 - 1500毫克/天)和安慰剂米索前列醇,治疗24周。主要终点是复发性上消化道出血。次要终点是发生包括溃疡出血、症状性溃疡和严重消化不良在内的重大胃肠道事件的患者比例。

结果

意向性分析共纳入90例患者(米索前列醇/萘普生组45例,萘丁美酮组45例)。接受米索前列醇/萘普生治疗的患者中有10例(22.2%)发生复发性出血,而接受萘丁美酮治疗的患者中有3例(6.7%)发生复发性出血(相对风险3.33,95%可信区间:0.98 - 11.32,P = 0.069)。24周时,米索前列醇/萘普生组发生重大胃肠道事件的患者比例为31.1%,萘丁美酮组为28.9%。

结论

米索前列醇/萘普生在上消化道出血二级预防方面并不优于萘丁美酮。小剂量米索前列醇和萘丁美酮对高危NSAIDs使用者均不足够。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验