Suppr超能文献

关于《判断与决策中的持续时间何时重要?》(艾瑞里和洛温斯坦,2000年)的联合评论

Joint comment on "when does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" (Ariely & Loewenstein, 2000).

作者信息

Ariely D, Kahneman D, Loewenstein G

机构信息

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 38 Memorial Drive, E56329, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Dec;129(4):524-9. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.524.

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that people care about the temporal relationships within a sequence of experiences. There is considerable evidence that people pay particular attention to the way experiences improve or deteriorate over time and to their maximum (peak) and final values. D. Kahneman and coauthors suggested in earlier articles that people ignore or severely underweight duration (which they referred to as duration neglect). In the preceding article, D. Ariely and G. Loewenstein (2000) challenged the generalizability of these findings and their normative implications. In the current commentary, D. Ariely, D. Kahneman, and G. Loewenstein jointly examine the issue to provide a better understanding of what they feel they have learned from this literature and to discuss the remaining open questions.

摘要

近期研究表明,人们在意一系列经历中的时间关系。有大量证据显示,人们特别关注经历随时间推移是如何改善或恶化的,以及它们的最大值(峰值)和最终值。D. 卡尼曼及其合著者在早期文章中提出,人们会忽略持续时间或严重低估其重要性(他们称之为持续时间忽视)。在上一篇文章中,D. 艾瑞里和G. 洛温斯坦(2000年)对这些发现的普遍性及其规范意义提出了质疑。在当前的评论文章中,D. 艾瑞里、D. 卡尼曼和G. 洛温斯坦共同探讨了这个问题,以便更好地理解他们认为从这一文献中学到的东西,并讨论剩余的未解决问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验