Wikström J, Palo J
Acta Neurol Scand. 1975 Feb;51(2):85-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1975.tb01362.x.
Further studies pm yjr rofr,op;phu pg ,i;yo;r dv;rtpdod (MS) IN Finland were carried out in three different types of geographical unit: in counties, combined clerical districts, and single clerical district. For longitudinal studies, the prevalence of MS by present domicile was compared to that by place of birth, and also to the number of MS cases in relation to the number of births. The analysis was based on 1,866 living MS patients. The highest prevalence by present domicile was recorded in the southwestern county of Turku and Pori (52.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants). It was 39.6 for the whole country. Two separate clusters were found at the level of combined and single clerical districts: one in the western county of Vaasa, and another in the southwestern county of Turku and Pori. The highest prevalences by present comicile were found in two clerical districts of Vaasa (83.5 and 79.7). They also had very high prevalences by place of birth. They lie close to each other, but are not immediate neighbours. Another high-risk focus was revealed in an area of the neighbouring districts of Turku and Pori. In fact, the two highest prevalences by place of birth were found in this region (123.1 and 95.0). The focus extended from the coastal area to the more central region of the county, and further to the western districts of the otherwise medium-risk county of Hme. Thus, two separate foci were found in Finland: one in the western and another in the southwestern part of the country. The clustering became even more pronounced when the prevalences by place of birth were analysed. Considering that the Finnish population still largely originates from genetic isolates of varying degrees, gene enrichment explains the clustering at least partly.
在芬兰,针对多发性硬化症(MS)开展了进一步研究,研究在三种不同类型的地理区域进行:郡、合并的教区以及单个教区。对于纵向研究,将按现居地统计的MS患病率与按出生地统计的患病率进行了比较,还将MS病例数与出生人数进行了比较。分析基于1866名在世的MS患者。现居地患病率最高的是图尔库和波里的西南郡(每10万居民中有52.3例)。全国患病率为39.6。在合并的教区和单个教区层面发现了两个独立的聚集区:一个在西部的瓦萨郡,另一个在西南部的图尔库和波里郡。现居地患病率最高的是瓦萨郡的两个教区(分别为83.5和79.7)。按出生地统计,它们的患病率也非常高。它们彼此相邻,但并非直接接壤。在图尔库和波里相邻地区发现了另一个高风险聚集区。事实上,该地区按出生地统计的患病率是最高的两个(分别为123.1和95.0)。这个聚集区从沿海地区延伸到该郡更中心的区域,进而延伸到原本风险中等的海门郡的西部地区。因此,在芬兰发现了两个独立的聚集区:一个在该国西部,另一个在西南部。当分析按出生地统计的患病率时,聚集现象变得更加明显。考虑到芬兰人口在很大程度上仍源自不同程度的基因隔离群体,基因富集至少在一定程度上解释了这种聚集现象。