Fabian T S, Kaufman H J, Lett E D, Thomas J B, Rawl D K, Lewis P L, Summitt J B, Merryman J I, Schaeffer T D, Sargent L A, Burns R P
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, USA.
Am Surg. 2000 Dec;66(12):1136-43.
We evaluated the efficacy of subatmospheric pressure and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) as adjuncts in the treatment of hypoxic full-thickness wounds in a rabbit model. We hypothesized that subatmospheric pressure and HBO independently are effective in improving wound healing in the ischemic wound model and that when they are used in combination there is an increased positive effect on wound healing. Using a standard ischemic wound model four full-thickness wounds were created on each ear of 41 male New Zealand white rabbits (N = 82 ears). On each rabbit one ear was dressed with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device and connected to suction; the other was dressed identically without the suction and suction tubing. Twenty rabbits were treated with HBO daily for 10 days at 2.0 atmospheres absolute for 90 minutes plus descent and ascent times. Necropsy on all rabbits was performed on postoperative day 10. Four ischemic wound treatment groups were evaluated: Group 1 (N = 21) VAC dressing alone; Group 2 (N = 20) VAC dressing plus HBO; Group 3 (N = 21) VAC dressing to suction alone; and Group 4 (N = 20) VAC dressing to suction and HBO. Using light microscopy a veterinary pathologist blinded to treatment groups quantified peak granulation tissue, granulation tissue gap, and epithelialization tissue gap. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance with significance indicated by P < 0.05. Statistical significance was found in a comparison of VAC dressing to suction and VAC dressing alone for peak granulation tissue and granulation tissue gap both with and without use of HBO. VAC device use appears to increase the rate of healing in a rabbit ischemic wound model. HBO therapy did not significantly affect the rate of healing in this model.
我们在兔模型中评估了负压和高压氧(HBO)作为辅助手段治疗缺氧性全层伤口的疗效。我们假设,负压和HBO单独使用时均可有效改善缺血性伤口模型中的伤口愈合情况,且二者联合使用时对伤口愈合具有更大的积极作用。利用标准缺血性伤口模型,在41只雄性新西兰白兔(N = 82只耳朵)的每只耳朵上制造4个全层伤口。在每只兔子身上,一只耳朵用真空辅助闭合(VAC)装置包扎并连接至负压吸引;另一只耳朵用同样的包扎方式但不连接负压吸引装置及吸引管。20只兔子每天接受HBO治疗,持续10天,压力为绝对2.0个大气压,治疗时间90分钟,外加减压和升压时间。所有兔子均在术后第10天进行尸检。评估了4个缺血性伤口治疗组:第1组(N = 21)仅使用VAC敷料;第2组(N = 20)使用VAC敷料加HBO;第3组(N = 21)仅使用连接负压吸引的VAC敷料;第4组(N = 20)使用连接负压吸引的VAC敷料加HBO。由一名对治疗组不知情的兽医病理学家通过光学显微镜对峰值肉芽组织、肉芽组织间隙和上皮化组织间隙进行量化。数据采用方差分析进行分析,P < 0.05表示具有统计学意义。在比较使用和未使用HBO的情况下,连接负压吸引的VAC敷料与仅使用VAC敷料时的峰值肉芽组织和肉芽组织间隙时,发现具有统计学意义。在兔缺血性伤口模型中,使用VAC装置似乎可提高愈合速度。在该模型中,HBO治疗对愈合速度没有显著影响。