Suppr超能文献

腹部伤口缝合用留置缝线的负面副作用。一项前瞻性随机研究。

Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study.

作者信息

Rink A D, Goldschmidt D, Dietrich J, Nagelschmidt M, Vestweber K H

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Leverkusen General Hospital, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 2000 Dec;166(12):932-7. doi: 10.1080/110241500447083.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of retention sutures on the postoperative course of patients after major abdominal operations.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, Germany.

SUBJECTS

95 patients who were at increased risk of wound failure after major abdominal operations.

INTERVENTION

Conventional mass closure either with (n = 44) or without (n = 51) reinforcement by wire retention sutures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain intensity on postoperative days 3, 6, 9, and 12, patients' acceptance, retention-suture-related morbidity, general morbidity.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain was overall more severe with retention sutures. On day 6, 31/49 control patients but only 13/41 patients with retention sutures were pain-free (p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.51). Twelve of 44 patients with retention sutures developed local complications of the sutures, and 21 of the 44 had to have them removed prematurely, in most cases because of intolerable pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Retention sutures used to close abdominal wounds cause inconvenience, pain, and specific morbidity.

摘要

目的

评估保留缝线对腹部大手术后患者术后病程的影响。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

地点

德国教学医院。

研究对象

95例腹部大手术后伤口愈合失败风险增加的患者。

干预措施

采用传统的整块缝合,其中44例使用钢丝保留缝线加强缝合,51例未使用。

主要观察指标

术后第3、6、9和12天的疼痛强度、患者接受程度、与保留缝线相关的发病率、总体发病率。

结果

使用保留缝线时,术后疼痛总体更严重。在第6天,49例对照组患者中有31例无痛,而使用保留缝线的患者中只有13/41例无痛(p = 0.003,95%CI 0.12至0.51)。44例使用保留缝线的患者中有12例出现缝线局部并发症,44例中有21例不得不提前拆除缝线,大多数情况是因为疼痛难忍。

结论

用于闭合腹部伤口的保留缝线会带来不便、疼痛和特定的发病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验