Monedero J, Donne B
Department of Physiology, Trinity College Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Int J Sports Med. 2000 Nov;21(8):593-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8488.
The recovery process in sport plays an essential role in determining subsequent athletic performance. This study investigated the effectiveness of different recovery interventions after maximal exercise. Eighteen trained male cyclists initially undertook an incremental test to determine maximal oxygen consumption. The four recovery interventions tested were: passive, active (50% maximal oxygen uptake), massage, and combined (involving active and massage components). All test sessions were separated by 2 to 3 days. During intervention trials subjects performed two simulated 5 km maximal effort cycling tests (T1 and T2) separated by a 20 min recovery. Performance time for the tests (t1, t2); blood lactate (BLa) during T1, T2, and every 3 min during recovery; and heart rate (HR) during the recovery intervention and T2 were recorded. Combined recovery was found to be better than passive (P<0.01) and either active or massage (P<0.05) in maintenance of performance time during T2. Active recovery was the most effective intervention for removing BLa at minutes 9 and 12, BLa removal during combined recovery was significantly better than passive at minute 3, and significantly better than passive, active, and massage at minute 15. In conclusion, combined recovery was the most efficient intervention for maintaining maximal performance time during T2, and active recovery was the best intervention for removing BLa.
运动中的恢复过程在决定后续运动表现方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究调查了最大运动后不同恢复干预措施的效果。18名经过训练的男性自行车运动员最初进行了递增测试以确定最大摄氧量。测试的四种恢复干预措施分别为:被动恢复、主动恢复(最大摄氧量的50%)、按摩以及联合恢复(包括主动恢复和按摩成分)。所有测试环节间隔2至3天。在干预试验期间,受试者进行了两次模拟5公里全力骑行测试(T1和T2),中间间隔20分钟恢复时间。记录测试的表现时间(t1、t2);T1、T2期间以及恢复过程中每3分钟的血乳酸(BLa);以及恢复干预期间和T2期间的心率(HR)。结果发现,联合恢复在维持T2期间的表现时间方面优于被动恢复(P<0.01)以及主动恢复或按摩(P<0.05)。主动恢复是在第9分钟和第12分钟清除BLa最有效的干预措施,联合恢复在第3分钟时清除BLa明显优于被动恢复,在第15分钟时明显优于被动恢复、主动恢复和按摩。总之,联合恢复是在T2期间维持最大表现时间最有效的干预措施,而主动恢复是清除BLa的最佳干预措施。