Hein H O, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F
The Copenhagen Male Study, Epidemiological Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, 23 Bispebjerg Bakke, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Heart. 2001 Feb;85(2):159-64. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.2.159.
To test the hypothesis that the predictive value for risk of fatal ischaemic heart disease associated with Lewis phenotypes depends on the level of leisure time physical activity.
Prospective study controlling for alcohol, tobacco, serum cotinine, blood pressure, body mass index, serum lipids, work related physical activity, and social class.
The Copenhagen male study, Denmark.
2826 white men aged 53-75 years without overt cardiovascular disease; 266 (9.4%) had the Le(a-b-) phenotype.
Incidence of death from ischaemic heart disease during 11 years.
107 men died of ischaemic heart disease. Among men with a low level of leisure time physical activity (</= 4 hours/week moderate or </= 2 hours/week more vigorous activity), being Le(a-b-) was associated with an increased risk of having a fatal ischaemic heart disease event compared with men with other Lewis phenotypes (relative risk (RR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 5.2; p < 0.01). Among men with a high level of leisure time physical activity, the RR associated with being Le(a-b-) was 1. 3 (95% CI 0.5 to 3.1; NS). Compared with all other alternatives tested, being Le(a-b-) and having a low level of leisure time physical activity was associated with an RR of 3.2 (95% CI 1.7 to 5. 8; p < 0.001). As a point estimate and adjusted for confounding variables, among men with low leisure time physical activity the attributable risk associated with Le(a-b-) was 12%-that is, assuming that all sedentary men had phenotypes other than Le(a-b-), 12% of all fatal ischaemic heart disease events would not have occurred. The corresponding point estimate among those more active was 2%.
The excess risk of fatal ischaemic heart disease in middle aged and elderly men with the Le(a-b-) phenotype is strongly modified by leisure time physical activity. Public health and clinical implications may be important in populations with a predominantly sedentary lifestyle and in a high proportion of men with the Le(a-b-) phenotype.
检验与Lewis血型相关的致死性缺血性心脏病风险的预测价值取决于休闲时间体力活动水平这一假设。
前瞻性研究,对酒精、烟草、血清可替宁、血压、体重指数、血脂、工作相关体力活动和社会阶层进行控制。
丹麦哥本哈根男性研究。
2826名年龄在53 - 75岁之间、无明显心血管疾病的白人男性;266人(9.4%)为Le(a-b-)血型。
11年间缺血性心脏病死亡发生率。
107名男性死于缺血性心脏病。在休闲时间体力活动水平较低(每周中等强度活动≤4小时或每周高强度活动≤2小时)的男性中,与其他Lewis血型的男性相比,Le(a-b-)血型与致死性缺血性心脏病事件风险增加相关(相对风险(RR)2.7,95%置信区间(CI)1.4至5.2;p<0.01)。在休闲时间体力活动水平较高的男性中,与Le(a-b-)血型相关的RR为1.3(95%CI 0.5至3.1;无显著性差异)。与所有其他测试的情况相比,Le(a-b-)血型且休闲时间体力活动水平较低与RR为3.2相关(95%CI 1.7至5.8;p<0.001)。作为一个点估计值并针对混杂变量进行调整后,在休闲时间体力活动水平较低的男性中,与Le(a-b-)血型相关的归因风险为12%——也就是说,假设所有久坐不动的男性具有除Le(a-b-)血型以外的其他血型,那么所有致死性缺血性心脏病事件中有12%不会发生。在体力活动较多的男性中,相应的点估计值为2%。
休闲时间体力活动对中年及老年Le(a-b-)血型男性致死性缺血性心脏病的额外风险有显著影响。在久坐不动生活方式占主导且Le(a-b-)血型男性比例较高的人群中,对公共卫生和临床的影响可能很重要。