Suppr超能文献

火器时代的穿透性胸部损伤。

Penetrating chest injuries in the firearm era.

作者信息

Madiba T E, Thomson S R, Mdlalose N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Natal and King Edward VIII Hospital, Private Bag 7, Congella, 4013, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

Injury. 2001 Jan;32(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00110-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

firearm wounds of the chest are now common at our institution. The management algorithm for firearm wounds has not been evaluated for this mode of injury.

METHODS

records of all patients with penetrating chest injuries admitted to an urban tertiary hospital over 1 year were retrieved and analysed.

RESULTS

there were 473 stab and 116 firearm wounds. In comparison to stab injuries firearm wounds had significantly more normal X-rays (14 vs. 5%), fewer pneumothoraces (15 vs. 37%), and more contusions (43 vs. 2%). The frequency of haemothoraces (34 vs. 23%) and haemopneumothoraces (36 vs. 35%) was similar in both groups. Stabbing caused all the 18 cardiac injuries. Associated abdominal injuries occurred in 8% of stab and 34% of firearm injuries. Pneumothoraces due to firearms were uncommon and rarely required drainage. More pneumothoraces were treated nonoperatively among firearm injuries in contrast to stabbing injuries where the opposite applied. The management of haemothorax and haemopneumothorax was similar in both groups that fulfilled the criteria for drainage. The rate of ICU admission was higher and the hospital-stay longer following firearm injuries. Fifty-nine patients died (10% of the total), 33 (28%) from the firearm injuries and 26 (6%) from stab-wounds. Early deaths were 1 and 3% for stabs and firearms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

patients with firearm injuries reaching hospital suffered three times higher mortality and a longer ICU and hospital stay than those with stab injuries. However, early mortality was similar for both modes of injury and validates the continued application of the stab wound derived management algorithm to all modes of injury.

摘要

背景

胸部火器伤在我院现已很常见。针对这种损伤模式,尚未对火器伤的处理流程进行评估。

方法

检索并分析了一家城市三级医院1年内收治的所有穿透性胸部损伤患者的记录。

结果

有473例刺伤和116例火器伤。与刺伤相比,火器伤患者的X线表现正常者显著更多(14%对5%),气胸更少(15%对37%),挫伤更多(43%对2%)。两组血胸(34%对23%)和气胸血胸(36%对35%)的发生率相似。所有18例心脏损伤均由刺伤所致。8%的刺伤患者和34%的火器伤患者伴有腹部损伤。火器伤导致的气胸不常见,很少需要引流。与刺伤相反,火器伤导致的气胸更多采用非手术治疗。两组中符合引流标准的血胸和气胸血胸的处理方式相似。火器伤后入住重症监护病房的比例更高,住院时间更长。59例患者死亡(占总数的10%),33例(28%)死于火器伤,26例(6%)死于刺伤。刺伤和火器伤的早期死亡率分别为1%和3%。

结论

到达医院的火器伤患者的死亡率比刺伤患者高三倍,重症监护病房住院时间和住院时间更长。然而,两种损伤模式的早期死亡率相似,这证实了源自刺伤处理流程的算法可继续应用于所有损伤模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验