Simon A, Levenson J
Centre de Médecine Préventive Cardiovasculaire, Hôpital Broussais, 96 Rue Didot, 75674 Paris, France.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001 Feb;3(1):74-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-001-0084-9.
Two traditional methodologic approaches, the analysis of the arterial pressure waveform in the time domain and the measurement of pulse wave velocity along the arterial tree, have been extensively used to determine the distensibility of large arteries in humans. They have shown that large artery walls are stiffened in the presence of hypertension. However, several methodologic limitations, especially the incapability of these methods to take into account the physiologic pressure-dependence of arterial distensibility, have led to the development of new approaches for characterizing more in depth the elastic and viscous properties of large arteries. The noninvasive recording of instantaneous pressure and diameter waveforms in superficial arteries (carotid or femoral) by means of tonometry and ultrasonography allows, via appropriate model of the arterial wall, determination of the pure elastic properties as well as the wall viscosity of the vessel. Using case (hypertensive)-control (normotensive) studies it has been found that elastic alteration (stiffening) was preferential in the femoral artery rather than in the carotid artery and that viscous alteration (increased wall viscosity) was relatively uniform in both arteries. This topographic dissociation between elastic and viscous responses of the arterial wall to hypertension suggests that the elastic alteration might be a local phenomena dependent on the singularities of the arterial system, whereas abnormal wall viscosity may reflect a more general influence of hypertension on large artery smooth muscle, the likely determinant factor of viscosity. Therefore, the elastic and viscous components of the arterial walls should be considered independently when assessing the development of hypertensive vascular change and its response to antihypertensive treatment.
两种传统的方法学途径,即时域内动脉压力波形分析以及沿动脉树测量脉搏波速度,已被广泛用于测定人体大动脉的扩张性。这些方法表明,在高血压情况下大动脉壁会变硬。然而,一些方法学上的局限性,尤其是这些方法无法考虑动脉扩张性的生理压力依赖性,促使了新方法的发展,以便更深入地描述大动脉的弹性和黏性特性。通过张力测量法和超声检查对浅表动脉(颈动脉或股动脉)的瞬时压力和直径波形进行无创记录,借助动脉壁的适当模型,可以确定血管的纯弹性特性以及壁黏性。通过病例(高血压)-对照(正常血压)研究发现,弹性改变(变硬)在股动脉中比在颈动脉中更为明显,而黏性改变(壁黏性增加)在两条动脉中相对较为一致。动脉壁对高血压的弹性和黏性反应之间的这种局部差异表明,弹性改变可能是一种依赖于动脉系统奇点的局部现象,而异常的壁黏性可能反映了高血压对大动脉平滑肌更普遍的影响,而平滑肌可能是黏性的决定因素。因此,在评估高血压血管变化的发展及其对抗高血压治疗的反应时,应分别考虑动脉壁的弹性和黏性成分。