Guridi J, Rodriguez-Oroz M C, Lozano A M, Moro E, Albanese A, Nuttin B, Gybels J, Ramos E, Obeso J A
Centro de Neurocirugia Funcional, Clinica Quiron, San Sebastian, Spain.
Neurology. 2000;55(12 Suppl 6):S21-8.
The revitalization of surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD) has fueled discussion about the best methodology to define the target. Placement of electrodes for deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires the usual stereotactic technique but the argument is mainly centered on whether or not microrecording neuronal activity is necessary. We compared the accuracy of calculating the coordinates X (medio-lateral) and Y (rostro-caudal) considered by the classic stereotactic method, i.e., definition of the AC-PC intercomissural line by MRI and a digitized version of the Schaltenbrand's atlas, with final electrode placement according with microrecording and microstimulation in 21 patients. For both the globus pallidum internum (GPi) (n = 21) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (n = 36) there was, respectively, a 43% and 45% mismatching of more than 3 mm between the theoretic coordinates and the final site of electrode location. This applies to both the X and Y planes. Accuracy was not improved in patients (n = 11) in whom the bilateral procedure was undertaken in a single day. We conclude that proper electrode positioning of the STN and GPi requires fine electrophysiologic assessment.
帕金森病(PD)手术的复兴引发了关于确定靶点最佳方法的讨论。深部脑刺激(DBS)电极的放置需要常规的立体定向技术,但争论主要集中在是否有必要进行微记录神经元活动。我们比较了经典立体定向方法所考虑的计算坐标X(内侧-外侧)和Y(前后)的准确性,即通过MRI定义AC-PC连合间线以及Schaltenbrand图谱的数字化版本,与21例患者根据微记录和微刺激确定的最终电极位置。对于内侧苍白球(GPi)(n = 21)和丘脑底核(STN)(n = 36),理论坐标与电极最终位置之间分别有43%和45%的偏差超过3mm。这在X和Y平面均适用。在同一天进行双侧手术的患者(n = 11)中,准确性并未提高。我们得出结论,STN和GPi的电极正确定位需要精细的电生理评估。